Update list: t.me is an actual website, not redirector

[eighthave]

User description

t.me shows the page for a user based on the path, I don't think it should be considered a URL shortener.

Pull Request Template

Description

Removing t.me from the active list.

Domain Usage Proof

• https://t.me/Matsuridayo
• https://t.me/misproyectos

Checklist

• I have confirmed the shortener domain(s) are active/inactive as indicated.
• I have verified that each domain's usage proof is correct and up to date.

Rationale

They show the user's page, they do not redirect.

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Remove t.me from URL shortener list

• t.me is a user profile page, not a redirector

• Clarifies distinction between actual shorteners and profile services

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["URL Shortener List"] -- "Remove t.me" --> B["Updated List"]
  C["t.me: User Profile Service"] -- "Not a Redirector" --> B

Loading

File Walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	list Remove t.me from shortener domains                                              list Removed t.me from the active URL shortener domains list t.me displays user profile pages based on path, not redirects Maintains list accuracy by excluding non-shortener services +0/-1

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated domain list by removing one entry.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Removed the domain t.me from a list, reducing the coverage by one entry. No other additions or alterations were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Domain list modification (file not explicitly identified in summary)	Removed domain entry t.me from the list

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Single, straightforward removal of a domain entry with no logic changes or side effects

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately reflects the main change: removing t.me from the list with a clear rationale that it's not a URL redirector.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description check	✅ Passed	The PR description includes all key sections from the template: description, domain usage proof, checklist, and rationale. The author provides clear reasoning that t.me is a user profile service, not a URL shortener.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @eighthave, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the classification of the "t.me" domain within a maintained list. It addresses the misconception that "t.me" acts as a URL shortener, clarifying that it directly displays user-specific content, such as Telegram profiles. The change ensures the list accurately reflects the functional nature of included domains.

Highlights

• Domain Classification Correction: The domain "t.me" has been removed from the active list, as it functions as a direct link to user pages (e.g., Telegram profiles) rather than a URL shortener or redirector.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request removes t.me from the list of URL shorteners. The rationale provided is that t.me links to Telegram user and channel pages directly, rather than acting as a generic URL redirector. This change is correct and improves the accuracy of the list. The modification is well-described and aligns with the project's purpose. I approve of this change.