Skip to content

Conversation

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
license-maven-plugin (source) build patch 2.7.0 -> 2.7.1

The Developer Platform team wishes you a happy festive period! 🎄
cody-christmas-banner


Release Notes

mojohaus/license-maven-plugin (license-maven-plugin)

v2.7.1

Compare Source

💥 Breaking changes

🚀 New features and improvements

  • Bump LibreOffice library odfdom-java to 0.12.0, require JDK 11+ for generating Calc file ODS (#​684) @​slawekjaranowski
  • Fix for issues/533 (dual licensed dependency with one license on whitelist and the other on blacklist) (#​670) @​wuwu2000
  • Make Mojos thread-safe and improve concurrent cache handling (#​674) @​shaikhu

👻 Maintenance

📦 Dependency updates


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade license-maven-plugin 2.7.0 -> 2.7.1 (#2052)

See:
- https://github.com/mojohaus/license-maven-plugin/releases/tag/2.7.1
- https://github.com/mojohaus/license-maven-plugin/compare/2.7.0...2.7.1

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.28.0 milestone Jan 5, 2026
Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Output unchanged.

@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/license-maven-plugin-2.x branch from f0d401f to 7ea7756 Compare January 5, 2026 08:00
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 5, 2026

@Stephan202 Stephan202 merged commit 7e3c268 into master Jan 5, 2026
19 checks passed
@Stephan202 Stephan202 deleted the renovate/license-maven-plugin-2.x branch January 5, 2026 08:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants