Fix: RFQ Accept fixes

[JonathanAmenechi]

Note

Accept flow now computes the correct token, side, and size from RFQ quote match type (COMPLEMENTARY/MERGE/MINT) with new helper and types.

• RFQ Client (src/rfq-client.ts):
  • Add getRequestOrderCreationPayload to derive token/side/size from RfqQuote.matchType (handles COMPLEMENTARY, MERGE, MINT).
  • acceptRfqQuote now uses this helper and passes the derived side, size, and token to createOrder and acceptance payload.
• Types (src/types.ts):
  • Add RfqMatchType enum and matchType to RfqQuote.
  • Introduce RfqRequestOrderCreationPayload.
• Package:
  • Bump version to 5.1.1.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit df4cb50. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR fixes the RFQ (Request for Quote) accept logic to properly handle different quote match types (COMPLEMENTARY, MERGE, and MINT). The key changes introduce match type awareness when creating orders from quotes, ensuring the correct side, token, and size are used based on the quote's match type.

Key Changes

• Introduced RfqMatchType enum to categorize quote matching scenarios
• Added matchType field to RfqQuote interface
• Refactored order creation logic to determine correct parameters based on match type

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File	Description
src/types.ts	Defines the RfqMatchType enum, adds matchType field to RfqQuote, and introduces RfqRequestOrderCreationPayload interface
src/rfq-client.ts	Refactors quote acceptance logic by extracting order payload calculation into getRequestOrderCreationPayload() method that handles different match types
package.json	Version bump from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Use strict equality (===) instead of loose equality (==) for type safety and consistency with other comparisons in the codebase.

[Copilot]

Use strict equality (===) instead of loose equality (==) for type safety and consistency with other comparisons in the codebase.

Suggested change

	size = side == Side.BUY ? quote.sizeIn : quote.sizeOut;
	size = side === Side.BUY ? quote.sizeIn : quote.sizeOut;

[Copilot]

The matchType field is typed as 'string' but should be typed as 'RfqMatchType' (the enum defined above) to provide type safety and prevent invalid values.

Suggested change

	readonly matchType: string;
	readonly matchType: RfqMatchType;