Skip to content

Work#207

Merged
JaCoderX merged 2 commits into
devfrom
work
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

Work#207
JaCoderX merged 2 commits into
devfrom
work

Conversation

@JaCoderX

@JaCoderX JaCoderX commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Scope

  • This PR does not modify any file under contracts/core/
  • If this PR touches smart contracts, it is limited to contracts/examples/ or other non-core paths
  • This is not a security vulnerability report (those go to SECURITY.mdsecurity@particlecs.com)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-core)
  • Documentation
  • SDK (sdk/typescript/) — no core contract changes required
  • Tooling / CI / scripts
  • Example / integration (non-core)
  • Other (describe below)

Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO)

  • Every commit in this PR includes Signed-off-by: Your Name <your.email@example.com> (git commit -s) — required for the DCO / Signed-off-by CI check to pass
  • I have read DCO and CONTRIBUTING.md (IP, contribution policy, and core restrictions)

Intellectual property

  • I license this contribution under MPL-2.0 and have the right to do so (including employer/client authorization if applicable)
  • This contribution is my original work or permitted derivative work; I have not included third-party code under incompatible licenses (e.g. GPL/AGPL) without maintainer approval
  • I understand Particle Crypto Security does not receive copyright assignment via this PR

Testing

  • I ran relevant tests locally (see CONTRIBUTING.md / AGENTS.md)
  • I added or updated tests where appropriate
  • No secrets, private keys, or production deployment credentials are included

Documentation

  • User-facing docs updated where needed (not hand-editing docs/_auto_generated_docs_/)
  • NatSpec / JSDoc updated for API changes I own in this PR

Additional notes

JaCoderX and others added 2 commits June 3, 2026 16:01
This commit updates the Node.js engine requirements in `package.json`, `package-lock.json`, and documentation files to enforce a minimum version of 22.12.0 for monorepo development. It clarifies that SDK consumers still require Node.js version 18.20.5 at runtime. Additionally, the CI workflow is adjusted to reflect the new Node.js version requirement, ensuring consistency across development environments. These changes aim to enhance compatibility and streamline the development process.

Signed-off-by: JaCoderX <12550942+JaCoderX@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit enhances various documentation files to include details about the independent audit of the core protocol by Nethermind (report NM_0828). The `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `README.md`, `SECURITY.md`, and other relevant files have been updated to reference the audit report, its scope, and the implications for mainnet deployment. Additionally, links to the audit documentation and change policies have been added for clarity. These updates aim to improve transparency and provide essential context for contributors and users regarding the security status of the Bloxchain Protocol.

Signed-off-by: JaCoderX <12550942+JaCoderX@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@JaCoderX, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 25 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c5e4fa5b-4a32-4704-9d2d-8d63337742bb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee6195b and ba6c76b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • audits/nethermind/Nethermind-Bloxchain-Core-NM_0828.pdf is excluded by !**/*.pdf
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
  • .github/workflows/particle-ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/release-please.yml
  • .github/workflows/sync-contract-versions.yml
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
  • README.md
  • SECURITY.md
  • TECHNICAL_OVERVIEW.md
  • audits/README.md
  • audits/nethermind/README.md
  • contracts/core/AUDIT.md
  • docs/README.md
  • docs/_auto_generated_docs_/README.md
  • docs/api-reference.md
  • docs/examples-basic.md
  • docs/index.md
  • package.json
  • package/README.md
  • sdk/typescript/README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch work

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@JaCoderX JaCoderX merged commit 4b584ff into dev Jun 3, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant