Skip to content

Conversation

@Psychoboy
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @Psychoboy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow for SonarQube analysis. The workflow is triggered on push events to the main branch and on pull request events. It sets up JDK 17, checks out the code, caches SonarQube Cloud packages and scanner, installs the SonarQube Cloud scanner and dotnet-coverage, builds the project, collects code coverage data, and then performs the SonarQube analysis.

Highlights

  • CI Workflow: Adds a new CI workflow for SonarQube analysis.
  • SonarQube Integration: Integrates SonarQube Cloud for static code analysis.
  • Code Coverage: Collects code coverage data using dotnet-coverage.

Changelog

  • .github/workflows/sonarqube-analysis.yaml
    • Added a new workflow file for SonarQube analysis.
    • Configured the workflow to run on push and pull request events.
    • Set up JDK 17 using actions/setup-java@v4.
    • Checked out the code using actions/checkout@v4 with fetch-depth: 0.
    • Cached SonarQube Cloud packages and scanner using actions/cache@v4.
    • Installed SonarQube Cloud scanner using dotnet tool update.
    • Installed dotnet-coverage using dotnet tool install -g.
    • Configured the build and analyze steps to use the SonarQube scanner and dotnet-coverage.
    • Set the SONAR_TOKEN environment variable using secrets.SONAR_TOKEN.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A workflow defined, with YAML's grace,
To scan the code, at a steady pace.
With SonarQube's eye, and coverage's might,
It seeks out bugs, and brings them to light.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces a SonarQube analysis workflow to the project. This is a great addition for maintaining code quality and identifying potential issues early on. The workflow configuration seems comprehensive, covering build, test, and analysis steps.

Merge Readiness

The pull request introduces a valuable CI workflow for SonarQube analysis. Given the absence of critical or high severity issues, the pull request appears to be in good shape for merging. However, it's always a good practice to have other reviewers examine the changes before merging. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

Comment on lines +10 to +57
name: Build and analyze
runs-on: windows-latest
steps:
- name: checkout all the submodules
uses: actions/checkout@v2
with:
submodules: recursive
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v3
with:
dotnet-version: 9.0.x
submodules: 'true'
- name: Set up JDK 17
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
java-version: 17
distribution: 'zulu' # Alternative distribution options are available.
- name: Cache SonarQube Cloud packages
uses: actions/cache@v4
with:
path: ~\sonar\cache
key: ${{ runner.os }}-sonar
restore-keys: ${{ runner.os }}-sonar
- name: Cache SonarQube Cloud scanner
id: cache-sonar-scanner
uses: actions/cache@v4
with:
path: .\.sonar\scanner
key: ${{ runner.os }}-sonar-scanner
restore-keys: ${{ runner.os }}-sonar-scanner
- name: Install SonarQube Cloud scanner
if: steps.cache-sonar-scanner.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
shell: powershell
run: |
New-Item -Path .\.sonar\scanner -ItemType Directory
dotnet tool update dotnet-sonarscanner --tool-path .\.sonar\scanner
- name: Install dotnet-coverage
run: dotnet tool install -g dotnet-coverage
- name: Build and analyze
env:
SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}
shell: powershell
run: |
.\.sonar\scanner\dotnet-sonarscanner begin /k:"Psychoboy_PenguinTwitchBot" /o:"psychoboy" /d:sonar.token="${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}" /d:sonar.host.url="https://sonarcloud.io" /d:sonar.cs.vscoveragexml.reportsPaths="coverage.xml"
dotnet build
dotnet-coverage collect 'dotnet test' -f xml -o 'coverage.xml'
.\.sonar\scanner\dotnet-sonarscanner end /d:sonar.token="${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}" No newline at end of file

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
2 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@Psychoboy Psychoboy closed this Mar 5, 2025
@Psychoboy Psychoboy deleted the disableCi branch March 5, 2025 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants