-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
update versions of pycodestyle / pyflakes #1974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fnordahl
added a commit
to fnordahl/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
…heck (F824). flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
…heck (F824). flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
igsilya
pushed a commit
to igsilya/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
igsilya
pushed a commit
to igsilya/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
igsilya
pushed a commit
to igsilya/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
igsilya
pushed a commit
to igsilya/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
igsilya
pushed a commit
to igsilya/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
fnordahl
added a commit
to fnordahl/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 94c8a4c)
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 94c8a4c)
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 94c8a4c)
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit f68cc0c)
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit f68cc0c)
dceara
pushed a commit
to dceara/ovn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Building the OVS submodule is currently broken for the OVN CI due to a change in flake8 2.7.0 which introduced the F824 check [0][1]. This was tackled in OVS commit 7f4ee4395637 by disabling the check. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit f68cc0c)
martinmo
pushed a commit
to martinmo/ovs
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2025
flake8 2.7.0 introduced the F824 check [0]. While the check sounds reasonable on the surface, we have code in the repository where the global variable is used only for access. My conclusion from evaluating the alternative of adjusting the code to appease the check is that it would invite future mistakes where the global variable is unintentionally shadowed in addition to making the code less clear and explicit. 0: PyCQA/flake8#1974 1: PyCQA/pyflakes#825 Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7f4ee43)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.