Making hub and spoke dict callback a function of the model module instead of a separate module #499
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think having the callback that does hub and spoke dict manipulation in
generic_cylinders.py
as a function within the model module is more convenient because that manipulation can be dependent on the value of the config optionscfg
. The same could be achieved by just also passingcfg
to the callback the way it is written now but in the case where the user defines a class within their model module, having the callback be a method of the class makescfg
-dependent implementation straightforward.