Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@jakozaur
Copy link
Contributor

@jakozaur jakozaur commented Jun 4, 2025

Our logic of parsing CREATE TABLE needs to be replaced. This is code duplication and a potential issue.

First steps:

  1. Add logic to log proper bugs instead of eating them silently.
  2. Add some tests that reproduce the client issue. Though we decided against fixing our parser.
  3. Start by removing the confusing field Created. It is not used now, it is artifact from legacy hardcoding table.

@jakozaur jakozaur requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2025 09:47
Copy link
Member

@nablaone nablaone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pdelewski
Copy link
Contributor

@jakozaur That's the first step?, if I understand correctly

@jakozaur
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakozaur commented Jun 4, 2025

@pdelewski Yes, there is more refactoring. Though decided step by step approach is better.

@jakozaur
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakozaur commented Jun 4, 2025

/run-it

@jakozaur jakozaur added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6803ecd Jun 4, 2025
7 checks passed
@jakozaur jakozaur deleted the jacek-remove-created branch June 4, 2025 14:32
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants