Skip to content

Add post-test alerts#5232

Open
albarker-rh wants to merge 5 commits into
RedHatQE:mainfrom
albarker-rh:post-test-alerts
Open

Add post-test alerts#5232
albarker-rh wants to merge 5 commits into
RedHatQE:mainfrom
albarker-rh:post-test-alerts

Conversation

@albarker-rh

@albarker-rh albarker-rh commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What this PR does / why we need it:

Verifies 7 critical CNV alerts were not triggered during test execution. Follows the deprecated_api auto-inclusion pattern.

  • KubeVirtDeprecatedAPIRequested
  • LowVirtControllersCount
  • LowVirtAPICount
  • KubeVirtCRModified
  • VirtControllerRESTErrorsHigh
  • VirtHandlerRESTErrorsHigh
  • HCOOperatorConditionsUnhealthy
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

We don't check for the above critical alerts firing during test execution

Special notes for reviewer:
jira-ticket:

https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CNV-80353

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests

  • Added test infrastructure to validate that no post-test critical alerts remain firing after the run.
  • Introduced a new post-test alerts test-selection lane and integrated it into the test filtering flow.
  • Added a CLI option to skip post-test alert validation when needed.
  • Implemented Prometheus-based monitoring to detect and fail on any configured critical firing alerts within the test execution window.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@albarker-rh, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 59 minutes and 39 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0941072d-3d3b-4f58-afc6-935fdf9ff67f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4046061 and b62637f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • conftest.py
  • tests/post_test_alerts/__init__.py
  • tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py module is added with a list of critical CNV alert names and a Prometheus-based test that verifies none are firing after test execution. The conftest.py is updated to register the post_test_alerts marker across all team marker mappings, provide a --skip-post-test-alerts CLI option, auto-collect the new test directory, record test execution start time, and filter tests according to the skip flag and upgrade modes.

Changes

Post-test critical alert checker

Layer / File(s) Summary
Alert list and Prometheus test
tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py
Defines POST_TEST_CRITICAL_ALERTS (module-level list of critical alert names) and ALERTS_REGEX (regex alternation). Implements test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests(prometheus, request) marked with s390x, polarion("CNV-16276"), and order("last"). The test computes duration from request.config._test_execution_start_time, queries Prometheus for any matching alert names with alertstate="firing" over that window via prometheus.query_sampler, collects results by alertname, and asserts the collection is empty.
Conftest marker, CLI option, filter, and collection hook
conftest.py
Adds "post_test_alerts" to every team's marker list in TEAM_MARKERS; creates PostTestAlerts CLI argument group and --skip-post-test-alerts option matching deprecated API semantics; implements filter_post_test_alerts_tests() to deselect marked tests when flag is set or during --install/--upgrade modes; updates pytest_configure() to set config._test_execution_start_time and auto-append tests/post_test_alerts to collection; applies filter in pytest_collection_modifyitems() after deprecated API filtering.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested labels

new-tests


Caution

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

  • Ignore

❌ Failed checks (1 error)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Stp Link Required ❌ Error Module docstring in tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py has Jira link but missing required # inline comment on same line. Add # to line 6: Jira: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CNV-80353 # <skip-jira-utils-check>
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add post-test alerts' is under 120 characters and clearly describes the main change—addition of post-test alert verification functionality.
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description is well-structured, matching the template with all required sections completed: purpose, related issue, special notes, and JIRA ticket URL provided.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Linked repositories: Your configuration references 1 linked repositories, but your current plan allows 0. Analyzed ``, skipped RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

D/S test tox -e verify-tc-requirement-polarion failed: cnv-tests-tox-executor/29166

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Report bugs in Issues

Welcome! 🎉

This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features:

🔄 Automatic Actions

  • Reviewer Assignment: Reviewers are automatically assigned based on the OWNERS file in the repository root
  • Size Labeling: PR size labels (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) are automatically applied based on changes
  • Issue Creation: A tracking issue is created for this PR and will be closed when the PR is merged or closed
  • Branch Labeling: Branch-specific labels are applied to track the target branch
  • Auto-verification: Auto-verified users have their PRs automatically marked as verified
  • Labels: Enabled categories: branch, can-be-merged, cherry-pick, has-conflicts, hold, needs-rebase, size, verified, wip

📋 Available Commands

PR Status Management

  • /wip - Mark PR as work in progress (adds WIP: prefix to title)
  • /wip cancel - Remove work in progress status
  • /hold - Block PR merging (approvers only)
  • /hold cancel - Unblock PR merging
  • /verified - Mark PR as verified
  • /verified cancel - Remove verification status
  • /reprocess - Trigger complete PR workflow reprocessing (useful if webhook failed or configuration changed)
  • /regenerate-welcome - Regenerate this welcome message
  • /security-override - Set security check runs to pass (maintainers only)
  • /security-override cancel - Re-run security checks

Review & Approval

  • /lgtm - Approve changes (looks good to me)
  • /approve - Approve PR (approvers only)
  • /assign-reviewers - Assign reviewers based on OWNERS file
  • /assign-reviewer @username - Assign specific reviewer
  • /check-can-merge - Check if PR meets merge requirements

Testing & Validation

  • /retest tox - Run Python test suite with tox
  • /retest build-container - Rebuild and test container image
  • /retest verify-bugs-are-open - verify-bugs-are-open
  • /retest all - Run all available tests

Container Operations

  • /build-and-push-container - Build and push container image (tagged with PR number)
    • Supports additional build arguments: /build-and-push-container --build-arg KEY=value

Cherry-pick Operations

  • /cherry-pick <branch> - Schedule cherry-pick to target branch when PR is merged
    • Multiple branches: /cherry-pick branch1 branch2 branch3
  • /cherry-pick-retry <branch> - Retry a failed cherry-pick (merged PRs only)

Branch Management

  • /rebase - Rebase this PR branch onto its base branch

Label Management

  • /<label-name> - Add a label to the PR
  • /<label-name> cancel - Remove a label from the PR

✅ Merge Requirements

This PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:

  1. Approval: /approve from at least one approver
  2. LGTM Count: Minimum 2 /lgtm from reviewers
  3. Status Checks: All required status checks must pass
  4. No Blockers: No wip, hold, has-conflicts labels and PR must be mergeable (no conflicts)
  5. Verified: PR must be marked as verified

📊 Review Process

Approvers and Reviewers

Approvers:

  • dshchedr
  • myakove
  • rnetser
  • vsibirsk

Reviewers:

  • RoniKishner
  • dshchedr
  • rnetser
  • vsibirsk
Available Labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm
  • approve
AI Features
  • Cherry-Pick Conflict Resolution: Enabled (claude/claude-opus-4-6[1m])
Security Checks
  • Suspicious Path Detection: Monitors paths: .claude/, .vscode/, .cursor/, .devcontainer/, .pi/, .github/workflows/, .github/actions/
  • Committer Identity Check: Verifies last committer matches PR author
  • Mandatory: Security checks block merge (use /security-override to bypass — maintainers only)

💡 Tips

  • WIP Status: Use /wip when your PR is not ready for review
  • Verification: The verified label is removed on new commits unless the push is detected as a clean rebase
  • Cherry-picking: Cherry-pick labels are processed when the PR is merged
  • Container Builds: Container images are automatically tagged with the PR number
  • Permission Levels: Some commands require approver permissions
  • Auto-verified Users: Certain users have automatic verification and merge privileges

For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py`:
- Around line 1-7: The module docstring in test_post_test_alerts.py contains
only the Jira key "CNV-80353" instead of a full Jira URL as required by coding
guidelines for traceability. Replace the line "Jira: CNV-80353" with a complete
URL in the format "Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-80353" to provide
a proper link for coverage tracking and follow the requirement that RFE/Jira
links must be included as actual links in module, class, or test docstrings.
- Around line 48-49: The condition at line 48 only inspects the first element of
alerts_by_name using alerts_by_name[0]["state"], which means if a firing alert
exists in later entries of the list, it will be missed causing false negatives.
Fix this by using a loop or the any() function to check if ANY element in the
alerts_by_name list has state equal to "firing", rather than only checking the
first element at index 0. This ensures all alert samples are inspected to
determine if the alert is actively firing.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2e876e14-e533-4540-9a89-ce379cad38d7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e9579f and 484db23.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • conftest.py
  • tests/post_test_alerts/__init__.py
  • tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py

Comment thread tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py
Comment thread tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py Outdated
@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

@albarker-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/wip cancel

@albarker-rh albarker-rh changed the title [WIP] Add post-test alerts Add post-test alerts Jun 16, 2026
@albarker-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@albarker-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest tox
/build-and-push-container

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-2

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-5232 published

@albarker-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

albarker-rh and others added 5 commits June 26, 2026 09:08
Verifies 7 critical CNV alerts were not triggered during test execution.
Follows the deprecated_api auto-inclusion pattern.

Refs: CNV-80353

Signed-off-by: albarker-rh <albarker@redhat.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…fired alerts

Signed-off-by: albarker-rh <albarker@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: albarker-rh <albarker@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: albarker-rh <albarker@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: albarker-rh <albarker@redhat.com>
@albarker-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@albarker-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified 4.22 -s -o log_cli=true -m tier2 --jira tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py and post-test alerts ran after

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai

Test execution plan request details

CRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file.
The inline comment should contain the full Test Execution Plan (smoke decision, gating decision, and specific affected tests).
Do NOT submit a blocking review event (REQUEST_CHANGES/APPROVE).
Post a single inline PR comment on Files Changed (non-blocking COMMENT flow).

As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan.
You will post an inline review comment with the test execution plan on the first changed file.
If you fail to run or post a comment, retry.

Analysis Requirements:

  1. Examine code changes in each modified file

  2. Identify affected code paths, functions, and classes

  3. Analyze pytest-specific elements: fixtures (scope, dependencies), parametrization, markers, conftest changes

  4. Trace test dependencies through imports, shared utilities, fixture inheritance, fixture teardown, and yield from cleanup in conftest

  5. Detect new tests introduced in the PR

  6. Utilities and libs impact (when utilities/ or libs/ changes):
    You MUST use shell scripts (rg, git diff) to trace the full impact.
    Follow these sub-steps in order:

    6a. Identify modified symbols: For each changed file under utilities/ or libs/,
    list every modified function or method.
    Example: git diff HEAD~1 --unified=0 -- utilities/hco.py | grep '^[+-]def '

    6b. Find direct callers: Search tests and conftest for each symbol from 6a.
    Example: rg -l 'get_hco_version' tests/

    6c. Trace fixture teardown and cleanup: Find fixtures that reach
    the modified symbol through yield from or context-manager wrappers.
    Example: rg -l 'yield from.*enable_common_boot|def.*enable_common_boot' tests/

    6d. Trace same-file callers: In each changed file, find other functions
    whose body calls a modified symbol (including code after yield
    in @contextmanager helpers).
    Example: rg 'get_hco_version|enable_common_boot' utilities/hco.py

    6e. Expand transitively: If function A calls modified B, then
    tests/fixtures that call A are affected — even when the test body
    never imports B directly.

    Do NOT limit impact to tests that import the modified symbol only.

  7. Smoke test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with smoke-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.smoke' tests/
    VERIFY the above command returned actual file paths before concluding False.
    Set True if either condition is met:

    • a smoke-marked file appears in the affected set from 6b-6e, OR
    • any conftest.py in the smoke test's parent-directory hierarchy (up to repo root)
      imports or calls a modified utilities/libs symbol — including autouse fixtures
      that depend on modified functions. ALL tests in that directory and below are affected.
      Example check: for each smoke_file, scan dirname(smoke_file)/conftest.py,
      dirname(dirname(smoke_file))/conftest.py, etc. for modified symbol imports
      and autouse fixtures that depend on modified symbols.
  8. Gating test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with gating-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.gating' tests/
    Set True if a gating-marked file also appears in the affected set from 6b-6e.
    Utilities/libs changes often affect gating tests without affecting smoke tests.
    Do NOT stop analysis after concluding Run smoke tests: False.

Output rules:
Do NOT include analysis step numbers (1-8) in your visible output.

Your deliverable:
Your inline informational comment will be based on the following requirements:

Test Execution Plan

  • Run smoke tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path (test → fixture → changed symbol). True ONLY with a verified path.
  • Run gating tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path. True if any gating-marked test is in the affected set.
  • Affected tests to run (required when utilities/, libs/, or shared conftest changes — list concrete paths even when smoke is False)

Use these formats:

  • path/to/test_file.py - When the entire test file needs verification
  • path/to/test_file.py::TestClass::test_method - When specific test(s) needed
  • path/to/test_file.py::test_function - When specific test(s) needed
  • -m marker - When a marker covers multiple affected tests (e.g. -m gating only if ALL gating tests in scope need run)
  • Tag each listed test or group with its marker when not obvious, e.g. (gating) or (smoke)

Real test commands (MANDATORY when changes affect session/runtime code):

When the affected code runs at session/collection time (conftest fixtures, pytest plugins,
config hooks, session-scoped setup) or modifies runtime behavior that unit tests mock away,
you MUST include concrete pytest commands the PR author must run on a real cluster
to verify the change works end-to-end. Include:

  • A command for the error/fix path (the scenario the PR fixes)
  • A command for the happy path (regression: the normal case still works)
  • Use lightweight tests (e.g., --collect-only for startup failures,
    a single small test for runtime behavior)
    If the PR only changes test logic (not utilities/libs/conftest), the affected test
    paths themselves serve as the real test commands — no separate section needed.

Example output for a session-startup fix:

**Real tests (cluster required)**
Error path (the fix):
`pytest tests/storage/.../test_foo.py --storage-class-matrix=nonexistent-sc --collect-only`
Expected: ValueError with clear message, not IndexError

Happy path (regression):
`pytest tests/storage/.../test_foo.py --storage-class-matrix=<valid-sc> -k test_bar`
Expected: session starts normally

Guidelines:

  • Include tests affected directly OR via fixture setup/teardown, yield from cleanup, or transitive utility call chains (caller calls modified helper)
  • Use a full file path only if ALL tests in that file require verification
  • Use file path + test name when only specific tests use an affected fixture or utility wrapper (preferred for partial file impact)
  • If a test marker can cover multiple files/tests, provide the marker
  • Balance coverage vs over-testing - Keep descriptions minimal
  • Example: if leaf helper foo() changes, include tests whose fixture teardown calls wrapper bar() where bar() calls foo(), even when the test body only imports an unrelated symbol from the same utilities module

Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK):

When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:

  • Collection Safety: Fixtures MUST have existence checks (return None when hardware unavailable)
  • Test Plan: MUST verify both WITH and WITHOUT hardware:
    • Run affected tests on cluster WITH hardware
    • Verify collection succeeds on cluster WITHOUT hardware

CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES:

When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:

  1. YOUR ONLY DELIVERABLE: Post one non-blocking inline comment containing the test execution plan on the first changed line
  2. THEN STOP IMMEDIATELY - Do NOT generate any additional response
  3. FALLBACK ONLY: If inline comment API calls fail after retrying, post as a regular PR comment
  4. SILENCE = SUCCESS: After successfully submitting the review, your task is complete. No confirmation needed.

ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):

  • ❌ Do NOT post acknowledgment messages like "Test execution plan posted", "Review posted successfully", "I've successfully posted"
  • ❌ Do NOT mention review IDs, URLs, or confirmation of posting in the PR thread
  • ❌ Do NOT add any follow-up comments after submitting the review
  • ❌ Do NOT reply to confirm task completion
  • ❌ Do NOT explain what you did - just do it and stop

Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise.

CRITICAL — Verification rules for smoke and gating decisions:
- For each True decision, you must have traced a concrete path: test file → fixture → utility function → modified symbol.
- Do NOT assume impact based on scope, file proximity, or infrastructure-sounding names.
Only set True when you trace a concrete path through steps 6a-6e, then 7 or 8.
WRONG: "utilities/hco.py changed → run smoke" (no traced dependency path)
WRONG: "Run smoke tests: False" with no affected-test list when gating tests use the changed utility
RIGHT: "Run smoke tests: False, Run gating tests: True" plus tests/.../test_foo.py::TestBar::test_baz (gating)
RIGHT: "Smoke test X uses fixture Y → wrapper Z → changed function W in utilities/hco.py"

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

REPO="RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests"
PR_NUMBER="5232"

echo "== Fetch PR files in order =="
gh api "repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/files?per_page=100" > /tmp/pr_files.json
jq -r '.[].filename' /tmp/pr_files.json

FIRST_FILE=$(jq -r '.[0].filename' /tmp/pr_files.json)
echo "FIRST_FILE=$FIRST_FILE"

echo
echo "== Determine first added line in first file patch =="
PATCH=$(jq -r '.[0].patch // ""' /tmp/pr_files.json)

python - <<'PY' > /tmp/first_line.txt
import json, re, sys
from pathlib import Path
data = json.loads(Path('/tmp/pr_files.json').read_text())
patch = data[0].get('patch') or ''
current_new = None
first_added = None
for raw in patch.splitlines():
    if raw.startswith('@@'):
        m = re.match(r'^@@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(?:,\d+)? @@', raw)
        if m:
            current_new = int(m.group(1))
        continue
    if current_new is None:
        continue
    if raw.startswith('+') and not raw.startswith('+++'):
        first_added = current_new
        break
    if raw.startswith('-') and not raw.startswith('---'):
        continue
    current_new += 1

if first_added is None:
    raise SystemExit('Could not determine first added line in first file patch')
print(first_added)
PY

FIRST_LINE=$(cat /tmp/first_line.txt)
echo "FIRST_LINE=$FIRST_LINE"

echo
echo "== Latest head commit =="
COMMIT_SHA=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "$REPO" --json headRefOid --jq '.headRefOid')
echo "$COMMIT_SHA"

echo
echo "== Outline and inspect changed files =="
ast-grep outline "$FIRST_FILE" --view expanded || true
echo
SECOND_FILE=$(jq -r '.[1].filename // empty' /tmp/pr_files.json)
if [ -n "$SECOND_FILE" ]; then
  ast-grep outline "$SECOND_FILE" --view expanded || true
fi

echo
echo "== Targeted conftest evidence =="
rg -n -C3 'post_test_alerts|skip-post-test-alerts|deprecated_api|pytest_configure|pytest_collection_modifyitems|TEAM_MARKERS|file_or_dir|_test_execution_start_time' conftest.py

echo
echo "== New test evidence =="
sed -n '1,220p' tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py

echo
echo "== Smoke-marked tests (verify actual file paths) =="
rg -n --glob 'tests/**/*.py' '`@pytest`\.mark\.smoke' tests | head -100 || true

echo
echo "== Gating-marked tests (verify actual file paths) =="
rg -n --glob 'tests/**/*.py' '`@pytest`\.mark\.gating' tests | head -100 || true

echo
echo "== Search for direct references to post_test_alerts marker and new CLI option =="
rg -n -C2 'post_test_alerts|skip-post-test-alerts' tests conftest.py || true

COMMENT_FILE=/tmp/test_execution_plan.md
cat > "$COMMENT_FILE" <<'EOF'
## Test Execution Plan

**Run smoke tests: False**  
No verified dependency path from any `@pytest.mark.smoke` test to the changed code. The changes are limited to shared collection/session behavior in `conftest.py` plus the new post-test alert check, and no smoke-marked test was traced to this new lane.

**Run gating tests: False**  
No verified dependency path from any `@pytest.mark.gating` test to the changed code, and no gating-marked test was traced to the new post-test alert lane.

**Affected tests to run**
- `tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py::test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests`
- `tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py` — representative path to verify the auto-inclusion behavior when running a specific test path
- `tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py` with `--skip-post-test-alerts` disabled/enabled to verify collection filtering in shared `conftest.py`

**Real tests (cluster required)**

Error/fix path:
```bash
pytest tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py --skip-post-test-alerts --collect-only

Expected: tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py::test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests is not collected.

Happy path (regression):

pytest tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py --collect-only

Expected: the requested metrics test(s) are collected and tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py::test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests is auto-included.

End-to-end alert verification:

pytest -s -o log_cli=true -m tier2 --jira tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py

Expected: workload tests run normally and the post-test alert check runs last, failing only if one of the configured critical CNV alerts fired during the test window.
EOF

echo
echo "== Post inline review comment on first changed line =="
set +e
RESP=$(gh api "repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments"
--method POST
-f commit_id="$COMMIT_SHA"
-f path="$FIRST_FILE"
-F line="$FIRST_LINE"
-f side="RIGHT"
-f body@"$COMMENT_FILE" 2>&1)
STATUS=$?
set -e

echo "$RESP"

if [ $STATUS -ne 0 ]; then
echo
echo "== Inline comment failed; retry with review API position-based comment =="
POSITION=$(python - <<'PY'
import json, re
from pathlib import Path
data = json.loads(Path('/tmp/pr_files.json').read_text())
patch = data[0].get('patch') or ''
pos = 0
for raw in patch.splitlines():
if raw.startswith('@@'):
pos += 1
continue
pos += 1
if raw.startswith('+') and not raw.startswith('+++'):
print(pos)
break
else:
raise SystemExit("no added position found")
PY
)
echo "POSITION=$POSITION"
set +e
RESP2=$(gh api "repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/reviews"
--method POST
-f commit_id="$COMMIT_SHA"
-f event="COMMENT"
-f body=""
-f "comments[0][path]=$FIRST_FILE"
-F "comments[0][position]=$POSITION"
-f "comments[0][body]=$(cat "$COMMENT_FILE")" 2>&1)
STATUS2=$?
set -e
echo "$RESP2"

if [ $STATUS2 -ne 0 ]; then
echo
echo "== Inline comment retry failed; fallback to regular PR comment =="
gh pr comment "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "$REPO" --body-file "$COMMENT_FILE"
fi
fi


Length of output: 26401

---

</details>

`@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3`

**CRITICAL:** I could not complete the requested inline-post action because the GitHub integration does not have permission to write review comments on this PR.

Why this matters:
- The workflow requires a **non-blocking inline review comment** on the first changed line.
- The repo analysis is complete, but the write step is blocked by GitHub permissions, so auto-posting cannot succeed from this integration.

**Verified target location**
- File: `conftest.py`
- Line 104

**Evidence**
- Inline comment attempt failed first due a malformed CLI body argument.
- Retry to create a PR review comment failed with:
  - `403 Resource not accessible by integration`
- Fallback regular PR comment also failed with:
  - `GraphQL: Resource not accessible by integration (addComment)`

**Inline comment content to post manually**
```md
## Test Execution Plan

**Run smoke tests: False**  
No verified dependency path from any `@pytest.mark.smoke` test to the changed code. The changes are limited to shared collection/session behavior in `conftest.py` plus the new post-test alert check, and no smoke-marked test was traced to this new lane.

**Run gating tests: False**  
No verified dependency path from any `@pytest.mark.gating` test to the changed code, and no gating-marked test was traced to the new post-test alert lane.

**Affected tests to run**
- `tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py::test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests`
- `tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py` — representative path to verify the auto-inclusion behavior when running a specific test path
- `tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py` with `--skip-post-test-alerts` disabled/enabled to verify collection filtering in shared `conftest.py`

**Real tests (cluster required)**

Error/fix path:
```bash
pytest tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py --skip-post-test-alerts --collect-only

Expected: tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py::test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests is not collected.

Happy path (regression):

pytest tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py --collect-only

Expected: the requested metrics test(s) are collected and tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py::test_no_critical_alerts_after_tests is auto-included.

End-to-end alert verification:

pytest -s -o log_cli=true -m tier2 --jira tests/observability/metrics/test_vms_metrics.py

Expected: workload tests run normally and the post-test alert check runs last, failing only if one of the configured critical CNV alerts fired during the test window.


**HIGH:** One content fix is recommended before posting:
- The PR objective lists **7** alerts, but `tests/post_test_alerts/test_post_test_alerts.py` currently contains **6**.
- Missing alert: `KubeVirtDeprecatedAPIRequested`

That omission is important because it changes the effective verification scope of the new test.

@dshchedr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest all

Auto-triggered: Files in this PR were modified by merged PR #5440.

Overlapping files

conftest.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants