Reworked "When executing commands, if you don't see" rule fixing the "can't see output bug"

[jakenuts]

Description

Updated the language of the rule that prevented Roo from seeing the terminal output when using the latest Claude Sonnet 3.5 model.

Instead of:

When executing commands, if you don't see the expected output, assume the terminal executed the command successfully and proceed with the task. The user's terminal may be unable to stream the output back properly. If you absolutely need to see the actual terminal output, use the ask_followup_question tool to request the user to copy and paste it back to you.

It now reads:

• When executing commands, if you don't see any output, the user's terminal may be unable to stream the output back properly. Use the ask_followup_question tool to request the user to copy and paste it back to you.

Type of change

• [ X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

I loaded the history of a task where Roo was ignoring the terminal output (or rather "could not see" the output) and with this change to the associated rule Roo started seeing the errors and correcting them.

Checklist:

• [X ] My code follows the patterns of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [O] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• [O] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

Additional context

Related Issues

#1038

Reviewers