-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Add new element ActionPeriod in PassengerInformationActionStructure #190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 2.3
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@haeckerbaer, I think it would be good to discuss this one further to reach a consensus. It would help for most of us to make a better use of SIRI-SX. |
SteffenSuhr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really necessary even for sending preliminary messages
|
Since the consensus on this one only comes from stakeholders using the same implementation of SIRI SX, I would suggest to wait until consensus is found at the group level before merging. |
TuThoThai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Requesting a meeting to address all changes needed for ActionData, Affects & Consequences in SIRI-SX
|
As per the meeting of 19 December 2025: Agreement to have
|
Pain point to solve:
On PtSituationElement level one can define multiple ValidityPeriods (onbound). However, on Consequence or PassengerInformationAction level one cannot distinguish between these periods! On Consequence level this is solved by providing a corresponding element "Period" that overwrites the top level periods if one has to distinguish. However, on action level no such element exists.
A similar proposal was already discussed extensively within the SG7 group, but multiple counter proposals were suggested instead. These were all discussed within the UmS group (german speaking SX profile VDV736 that conceived the PassengerInformationActionStructure) but unfortunately were not able to solve the issues at hand.