Skip to content

Conversation

@Aurige
Copy link
Contributor

@Aurige Aurige commented Dec 3, 2025

Second proposal to include ServiceLinks updates
Takes into account the decision from the September 24th 2025 meeting (remove it from ET and add to CA)
Replaces #175

Provides a simplified description of an update of a SERVICE LINK, in order to provide an updated schematic shape (not ROUTE POINTs) in case of rerouting. Only updated ServiceLink are expected to be provided here, the scheduled one being provided by a NeTEx feed. The SERVICE JOURNEY itself is known from the context.
Note that, The shape (LineString) is mandatory in order to be consistent with the use case, which is to update the shape.
In this initial proposal, the Service Links update can be inserted either in a ChangeOfJourneyPattern ControlAction (to be repeated for each journey) either in a consequence of a PTSituation (can be shared accross multiple journeys).
Also note that an EstimatedVehicleJourneyStructure can be refer PTSituations containing the UpdatedServiceLinks information.

Provides a simplified description of an update of a SERVICE LINK, in order to provide an updated schematic shape (not ROUTE POINTs) in case of rerouting. Only updated ServiceLink are expected to be provided here, the scheduled one being provided by a NeTEx feed. The SERVICE JOURNEY itself is knonw from hte context.
Note that, The shape (LineString) is mandatory in order to be consistent with the use case, which is to update the shape.
In this initial proposal, the Service Links update can be inserted either in a EstimatedVehicleJourneyStructure (to be repeated for each journey) either in a consequence of a PTSituation (can be shared accross multiple journeys). As usual, the EstimatedVehicleJourneyStructure  can be linked with the PTSituation.
…o ControlAction

Removal of UpdatedServiceLinks from EstimatedTimetable and addition to the ChangeOfJourneyPattern ControlAction
@Aurige Aurige mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
@TuThoThai TuThoThai added ET For everything SIRI-ET SX For everything SIRI-SX CA For everything SIRI-CA Needs CEN documentation Update These require CEN documentation update to match XSD & examples labels Dec 3, 2025
@TuThoThai TuThoThai added this to the v2.3 milestone Dec 3, 2025
@haeckerbaer
Copy link
Collaborator

i would not merge it with 2.3 (as commented in PR 191) but with integration so that we don't have to resolve conflicts and do additional work when preparing 2.3 (since we decided to remove integration sooner or later)

@Aurige
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aurige commented Dec 8, 2025

i would not merge it with 2.3 (as commented in PR 191) but with integration so that we don't have to resolve conflicts and do additional work when preparing 2.3 (since we decided to remove integration sooner or later)

That was my initial intention, but when I tried, CA was not available in Integration !

@BredeD
Copy link
Collaborator

BredeD commented Jan 9, 2026

Are CA now available in Integration?
Can we get this approved by one more and merge it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CA For everything SIRI-CA ET For everything SIRI-ET Needs CEN documentation Update These require CEN documentation update to match XSD & examples SX For everything SIRI-SX

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants