Skip to content

Samet submission for SMT-COMP 2026#258

Merged
martinjonas merged 1 commit into
SMT-COMP:masterfrom
blishko:master
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

Samet submission for SMT-COMP 2026#258
martinjonas merged 1 commit into
SMT-COMP:masterfrom
blishko:master

Conversation

@blishko

@blishko blishko commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@blishko blishko force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from b92d238 to 72791f6 Compare May 26, 2026 13:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Summary of modified submissions

Samet

@wintered wintered added the submission Submissions for SMT-COMP label May 29, 2026
@Tomaqa

Tomaqa commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dear @blishko, do I understand correctly that there are no external tools employed, including the underlying SAT solver?

@blishko

blishko commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

That's correct. There are no external tools. The SAT solver is custom made.

@Tomaqa Tomaqa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK!

@martinjonas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blishko Thanks for submitting Samet to this year's SMT-COMP!

We have executed your solver on a small number of benchmarks from each logic it should compete in (except for the parallel track). You can find the results here:

It seems that there is some problem with your submission as all the executions end up with an error

libc++abi: terminating due to uncaught exception of type std::logic_error: Missing implementation
   in bool samet::frontend::smt::(anonymous namespace)::Session::execute_command()
   at /samet/src/frontend/smt/Interpreter.cpp:68

You can check whether all the results we have obtained are expected. If not, please let us know here.

Some notes:

  • We have used smaller resource limits than will be used in the final runs.
  • The benchmarks are scrambled by the official scrambler with seed 1.
  • The column status shows whether your solver decided the benchmark as sat (true) or unsat (false).
  • You can click on the value in the status column to see the output of your solver on that benchmark.

If you upload a new version of the solver and want to have another test run, let me know. We still have some time for that.

Happy rest of the competition!
Martin

@blishko blishko force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from ec65a95 to 3e0b930 Compare June 7, 2026 07:21
@blishko

blishko commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @martinjonas! Thanks for letting me know. I have uploaded a new version which should be able to run.
Fun fact: None of the QF_LRA single-query SMT-LIB benchmarks contains set-option command.

@martinjonas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blishko I updated the tables linked from the previous post with the new results. It looks much better now. :-)

@blishko

blishko commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have uploaded the final version of the solver.

@martinjonas martinjonas merged commit 0d7de5b into SMT-COMP:master Jun 12, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

submission Submissions for SMT-COMP

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants