Skip to content

Conversation

@homnath
Copy link

@homnath homnath commented Oct 7, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.80645% with 69 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 38.71%. Comparing base (a5bb135) to head (3e7a2b9).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/specfem3D/locate_source.F90 8.57% 32 Missing ⚠️
src/specfem3D/setup_sources_receivers.f90 30.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
src/specfem3D/compute_add_sources_viscoelastic.F90 7.14% 13 Missing ⚠️
src/specfem3D/get_cmt.f90 37.50% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/shared/read_parameter_file.F90 50.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...roblem_for_model/input_output/input_output_mod.f90 87.50% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/shared/count_number_of_sources.f90 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (a5bb135) and HEAD (3e7a2b9). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (a5bb135) HEAD (3e7a2b9)
5 4
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1746       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   50.49%   38.71%   -11.79%     
===========================================
  Files         271      271               
  Lines       61738    61828       +90     
===========================================
- Hits        31177    23935     -7242     
- Misses      30561    37893     +7332     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@homnath
Copy link
Author

homnath commented Oct 7, 2024

Interestingly, "Test_run_example 4 - small adjoint" runs fine on my side!

@homnath homnath requested a review from danielpeter October 7, 2024 19:49
@homnath homnath closed this Oct 7, 2024
@casarotti
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any update on this topic? I was considering include the Yoffe STF in the loop

@danielpeter
Copy link
Member

the patch above didn't make it into the devel version yet.

for force point sources (FORCESOLUTION), the Brune & smoothed Brune functions are implemented by using the setting source time function: 5 (or 6) in the FORCESOLUTION file. the above PR would have added a Par_file flag to achieve the same for CMTSOLUTION sources. a new pull request would need to be submitted for that.

@homnath
Copy link
Author

homnath commented Jan 16, 2025 via email

@adunham1
Copy link

@homnath Just wanted to chime in here, we worked together on this implementation about a year ago and I am currently using a working version for the smooth brune STF with a CMTSOLUTION for my simulations, I believe from your specfem3d fork. It would be great to see this new parameter in the devel version, I'm happy to help/run tests, just let me know!

@homnath
Copy link
Author

homnath commented Jan 24, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants