Skip to content

[Coding Guideline]: Ensure reads of union fields produce valid values#270

Merged
0 commit merged into
Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium:mainfrom
rcseacord:main
Dec 16, 2025
Merged

[Coding Guideline]: Ensure reads of union fields produce valid values#270
0 commit merged into
Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium:mainfrom
rcseacord:main

Conversation

@rcseacord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

added new guideline on unions

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for scrc-coding-guidelines ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 341529c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/scrc-coding-guidelines/deploys/6940c300fa27550008f4d8d3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-270--scrc-coding-guidelines.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@rcseacord rcseacord self-assigned this Dec 11, 2025
Comment thread src/coding-guidelines/types-and-traits.rst Outdated
@rcseacord rcseacord changed the title Update types-and-traits.rst Ensure reads of union fields produce valid values Dec 12, 2025
@rcseacord rcseacord changed the title Ensure reads of union fields produce valid values [Coding Guideline]: Ensure reads of union fields produce valid values Dec 12, 2025
@manhatsu
manhatsu force-pushed the main branch 4 times, most recently from 9dc2bcd to 587f8bc Compare December 16, 2025 02:24
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot closed this pull request by merging all changes into Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium:main in 34d0707 Dec 16, 2025
@manhatsu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I moved the commits here to a new feature branch rcseacord:doc/union-field-varidation. The corresponding PR is #300.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants