Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove network from compose files #1998

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2025
Merged

Remove network from compose files #1998

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2025

Conversation

NolanTrem
Copy link
Collaborator

@NolanTrem NolanTrem commented Feb 22, 2025

Important

Remove r2r-network from Docker Compose files, relying on default network behavior.

  • Network Removal:
    • Removed r2r-network from compose.full.swarm.yaml, compose.full.yaml, and compose.yaml.
    • Deleted network definition and removed from all services using it.
  • Services:
    • Services in compose.full.swarm.yaml, compose.full.yaml, and compose.yaml no longer specify r2r-network.
    • Services rely on default network behavior.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 74c23ab. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 74c23ab in 1 minute and 59 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 311 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 6 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. compose.full.swarm.yaml:1
  • Draft comment:
    Removal of the custom 'r2r-network' configuration is clear. Verify that service communication in swarm mode uses the appropriate default network.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is asking the PR author to verify something, which is against the rules. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code. Therefore, it should be removed.
2. compose.full.yaml:1
  • Draft comment:
    Custom network removal is done consistently. Ensure that all services can still communicate as expected without the 'r2r-network'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is asking the PR author to ensure that a change does not break communication between services, which is a form of asking for confirmation or testing. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested.
3. compose.yaml:1
  • Draft comment:
    The removal of network configuration simplifies the file. Confirm that using the default network does not impact inter-service communication.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is asking the PR author to confirm something about the impact of using the default network. It does not provide a specific code suggestion or point out a specific issue. It violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or ensure behavior.
4. compose.full.swarm.yaml:1
  • Draft comment:
    Removal of the custom network ('r2r-network') is clear; please verify that using Docker’s default swarm overlay network still meets your connectivity and isolation needs.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    The comment is asking the PR author to verify their needs, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or verification of intentions. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.
5. compose.full.yaml:1
  • Draft comment:
    Explicit network configuration has been removed; ensure that the services connected via the default network still communicate as expected, especially if isolation or specific routing was previously required.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the services still communicate as expected after a change. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
6. compose.yaml:1
  • Draft comment:
    Networks have been removed from the compose file; confirm that relying on the default network won’t cause service name collisions or connectivity issues, particularly in multi-project scenarios.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
    Docker Compose automatically creates a default network for all services to communicate. The removed network was a basic bridge network without special configuration. Service discovery works the same way in both cases. The comment is speculative about potential issues rather than pointing out a concrete problem. The default network behavior is a standard pattern in Docker Compose.
    The services might have special networking requirements not visible in this file. There could be external services or other compose files that were relying on the named network.
    Even if there were external dependencies, they would need to be explicitly configured to use this network. The default network behavior is sufficient for the services shown here.
    The comment should be deleted as it's speculative and asks for verification without pointing to a concrete issue. The default network configuration is sufficient for the shown services.

Workflow ID: wflow_v2VIFDredDrVqqfA


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@NolanTrem NolanTrem merged commit b0a32df into main Feb 22, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@NolanTrem NolanTrem deleted the Nolan/DockerNetwork branch February 22, 2025 20:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant