Skip to content

Update qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang SGLang image to v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x#1352

Open
Klaud-Cold wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/issue-1154-qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang
Open

Update qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang SGLang image to v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x#1352
Klaud-Cold wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/issue-1154-qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang

Conversation

@Klaud-Cold
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Update qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang image from lmsysorg/sglang:v0.5.10-rocm720-mi30x to lmsysorg/sglang:v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x

Ref #1154

Generated with Claude Code

…30x\n\nRef #1154\n\nCo-authored-by: Klaud Cold <Klaud-Cold@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook

If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow

As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers.

If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack.

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook

If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow

As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers.

If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack.

Comment thread perf-changelog.yaml
- qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang
description:
- "Update SGLang image from v0.5.10-rocm720-mi30x to v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x"
pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/XXX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 The new perf-changelog entry for qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang uses the placeholder pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/XXX instead of this PR's number. Please change XXX to 1352 so the link resolves and matches the convention used by every other entry in perf-changelog.yaml.

Extended reasoning...

What's wrong

The diff adds a new entry at the bottom of perf-changelog.yaml:

- config-keys:
    - qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang
  description:
    - "Update SGLang image from v0.5.10-rocm720-mi30x to v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x"
  pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/XXX

The pr-link value still contains the literal XXX placeholder rather than the actual PR number. Per the PR metadata, this is PR #1352, so the link should be https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/1352.

Why this is a bug, not stylistic

AGENTS.md (lines 300 / 323) documents pull/XXX as the template placeholder that authors must fill in when adding a changelog entry. Every other entry in the file uses a concrete PR number — the four entries immediately preceding this one reference /pull/1304, /1305, /1308, and /1310 (around lines 2325, 2332, 2338, 2345). The invariant the file maintains is: each changelog entry's pr-link points at the PR that introduced the corresponding config change, so the changelog is traceable back to its source review.

Step-by-step proof

  1. Open the PR in GitHub: this PR is numbered 1352 (see PR metadata title "Update qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang SGLang image to v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x", PR Update qwen3.5-bf16-mi300x-sglang SGLang image to v0.5.11-rocm720-mi30x #1352).
  2. Open perf-changelog.yaml at line 2351 — the new entry's pr-link reads https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/XXX.
  3. Visit that URL in a browser — GitHub returns a 404, since /pull/XXX is not a valid PR identifier.
  4. Compare with the immediately preceding entries: e.g. line 2345 reads pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/1310, which resolves to the actual PR that introduced that entry. The XXX entry breaks this invariant.

Impact

Purely a metadata/docs issue — no runtime, benchmark, or config behavior is affected. The only consequence is that the changelog entry for this image bump is not traceable to its originating PR (404 link).

Fix

Replace XXX with 1352 on line 2351:

  pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/1352

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant