Skip to content

Fix typo in README: complete incomplete word 'fnd' to 'fund'#3

Open
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
copilot/fix-e793c489-80eb-4019-bdfd-c83bb96e2d41
Open

Fix typo in README: complete incomplete word 'fnd' to 'fund'#3
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
copilot/fix-e793c489-80eb-4019-bdfd-c83bb96e2d41

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Oct 3, 2025

Fixed a typo in the README.md file where the description read "The IFNOT fnd" with an incomplete word. The word "fnd" has been corrected to "fund" to properly read "The IFNOT fund".

Changes

  • Updated README.md line 2 to complete the abbreviated word "fnd" → "fund"

This is a minimal documentation fix that improves the readability and completeness of the project description.

Original prompt

secret


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Co-authored-by: CosmicJesterX <195653949+CosmicJesterX@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] secret Fix typo in README: complete incomplete word 'fnd' to 'fund' Oct 3, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from CosmicJesterX October 3, 2025 08:59
@CosmicJesterX CosmicJesterX marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2025 01:15
@charliecreates charliecreates bot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@CosmicJesterX CosmicJesterX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed @CharlieHelps ?

@charliecreates
Copy link

#3 (review)

Yep, the README now correctly says “The IFNOT fund” and there are no remaining instances of the old “fnd” wording. This PR looks good from my side—nothing else to change, so you can merge whenever you’re ready.

@CosmicJesterX
Copy link
Member

@copilot , @CosmicJesterX and @CharlieHelps could you help merge this?

@charliecreates
Copy link

charliecreates bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Expand this to see my work.
  • Verified via a search on origin/main:README.md and the full tree of origin/main that there are no remaining instances of the old fnd typo, confirming main is already clean.
  • Inspected README.md on the PR head (copilot/fix-e793c489-80eb-4019-bdfd-c83bb96e2d41) and on origin/main to compare the current content line-by-line.
  • Ran gh pr diff 3 to confirm the PR’s only change is updating the single line in README.md from The IFNOT fnd to The IFNOT fund.
  • Confirmed that, because origin/main already has The IFNOT fund, merging PR #3 will be a no-op content-wise and presents no risk of reintroducing the typo or conflicting changes.
  • Reviewed commit 86722e3 on origin/main to confirm it already updated README.md so that line reads The IFNOT fund, matching the PR change exactly.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Nov 25, 2025

@copilot , @CosmicJesterX and @CharlieHelps could you help merge this?

I'm unable to merge PRs as I don't have the necessary GitHub permissions. Only repository maintainers with write access can merge pull requests. The code changes in this PR are complete - the typo fix changing "fnd" to "fund" in README.md has been committed (5cb460c). A maintainer will need to review and merge this PR.

Copilot AI requested a review from CosmicJesterX November 25, 2025 05:16
@charliecreates
Copy link

#3 (comment)

Right now GitHub won’t let this PR merge automatically because the branch conflicts with main—both sides have changed README.md since the PR was opened.

Also, the original fix from this PR (The IFNOT fndThe IFNOT fund) has already landed on main along with a more detailed README. There are no remaining fnd typos anywhere on main, so merging this branch would just create a messy conflict and risk clobbering newer README content.

So there isn’t anything left that needs merging here. I’d suggest:

  1. Keep main as-is (it already has the correct “The IFNOT fund” wording and updated copy).
  2. Close this PR as obsolete/superseded, since its intended change is already in main.

@CosmicJesterX
Copy link
Member

@charlie "Keep main as-is (it already has the correct “The IFNOT fund” wording and updated copy)." seems nice and we could go from there?

@charliecreates
Copy link

#3 (comment)

Yes, that’s exactly the idea: treat current main as the baseline and go from there.

Since main already has the correct “The IFNOT fund” wording and the newer README content, the clean path is:

  1. Leave main as-is (it already reflects the intended fix and updated copy).
  2. Close this PR as “already fixed on main” / obsolete, rather than trying to merge it through the conflict.
  3. If you want to iterate further on the README or docs, create a new branch off the latest main and open a fresh PR for that work.

If you tell me what you’d like to refine next (more detail on the fund, roadmap, FAQ, etc.), I can sketch a concrete next-steps plan for the README starting from current main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants