DATAGO-109272: upgrade Bouncy Castle to 1.79 #283
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Collaborator
Author
|
decided to exclude this vulnerability for now, the details documented here: https://sol-jira.atlassian.net/browse/DATAGO-109272 |
Collaborator
Author
|
decided to exclude this vulnerability for now, the details documented here: https://sol-jira.atlassian.net/browse/DATAGO-109272 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this change?
Vulnerability fix: CVE-2025-8916 - upgrade Bouncy Castle to 1.79 by overriding
bcprov-jdk18onversion in parent POM dependencyManagementHow was this change implemented?
updated pom file
Note: The vulnerable Bouncy Castle library is a transitive dependency brought in by
spring-security-rsa:1.1.3, but the newest version of spring-security-rsa:1.1.5 still uses Bouncy Castle 1.78:How was this change tested?
make sure all ITs pass and dependency tree check
before the fix:
after the fix:
Is there anything the reviewers should focus on/be aware of?
No