Skip to content

Conversation

muraj
Copy link
Contributor

@muraj muraj commented Sep 30, 2025

No description provided.

@muraj muraj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2025
@muraj muraj added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 30, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 27.38%. Comparing base (b9df3d6) to head (3e3f01e).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #323      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   27.15%   27.38%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files         190      190              
  Lines       39174    39188      +14     
  Branches    14166    14412     +246     
==========================================
+ Hits        10638    10732      +94     
- Misses      27240    28061     +821     
+ Partials     1296      395     -901     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@muraj muraj enabled auto-merge (squash) October 7, 2025 16:14
@muraj muraj disabled auto-merge October 7, 2025 16:14

status = ucc_collective_finalize(req);
ucc_check(status);
status = wait(context, [&req]() { return req->status; });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT: it is better to use ucc_collective_test even though it is the same as req->status, we do not need to know the implementation of a request.

{
assert(initialized_boot);

ucc_comm->UCC_Finalize();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants