Skip to content

Standardized test cases #97

Description

@pietercolpaert

Test cases need to be carefully standardized

Please comment with: existing cases elsewhere, and proposals to categorize the tests.

Pull request started in #120

Activity

  1. xdxxxdx commented on Nov 29, 2023

    @xdxxxdx
    Collaborator

    https://github.com/Informatievlaanderen/VSDS-Testbed
    The test suits are categorized by the non-normative keyworks : MUST SHOULD OPTIONAL

    The identified test points are listed here: [The test suit targets more LDES, not include the new extraction algorithm]
    https://github.com/xdxxxdx/pyldes_kbo/blob/main/ConformanceTesting/TressSpec/TreeSpecConformancePoints.md

  2. xdxxxdx commented on Apr 24, 2024

    @xdxxxdx
    Collaborator

    I think we need to

    • First, identify what this test is against. e.g. is it supposed to test against the input/output of the pipeline of a tree server?
    • Second we need to think about which kind of tool, or frame we would like these tests to run.
      • postman collection?
      • etc.
        How test run is interacted with?

    It will be helpful if we can have some reference test suits.
    e.g. test suite for activity hub? go-fed/activity#46

  3. xdxxxdx commented on Nov 6, 2024

    @xdxxxdx
    Collaborator

    Hello @pietercolpaert ,

    I prepared some step-to-step test case idea in the following attached slides.
    If time fits, I would like to talk about it in the next TREE meeting (dec 2024). Please let me know what do you think about it.

    Slides Proposition

    Thanks

  4. pietercolpaert commented on Dec 4, 2024

    @pietercolpaert
    MemberAuthor

    As discussed in the call of 2024-12-04:

    • We’ll focus the spec’s test suite on the client test cases
    • We’ll pull request a new report in this repository which will contain a full text description of the test cases
    • We’ll make a new repository with test suite assets that can be used by client implementers
  5. pietercolpaert commented on Dec 4, 2024

    @pietercolpaert
    MemberAuthor

    Pieter will start with a PR, @xdxxxdx will review and add things afterwards

  6. pietercolpaert commented on Feb 17, 2025

    @pietercolpaert
    MemberAuthor

    Started something here: #120

  7. moved this from Backlog to In progress in 2025-Marchon Apr 2, 2025
  8. unpinned this issue on Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

help wantedExtra attention is needed

Type

No type

Projects

  • Status
    In progress

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions