Useful user feedback titles

[staffordsmith83]

Current list of user feedback issues is not descriptive.
This PR should add the user provided issue description in the title of the github issue, or if not provided, add the username.

Im unsure how to test this short of deploying it.

[tephenavies]

I think having the Referrer in the title is an important part of this improvement, and I'm not sure if using name is very useful (in the very rare case that comment is not present). I think just fallback to a placeholder.

[staffordsmith83]

Hi @steve9164 Ana said she just wants the first part of the description in the ticket title - thats how she knows what the tickets are about when trolling through them. Adding the referrer in too means less description can fit in the title. And if people want referrer, then can open the ticket. Thoughts? I know its important, just that she is the one that asked for the feature in the first place so should have a good grasp on whats most useful for her as end user. Do you need to troll through these too sometimes?

[tephenavies]

I'm happy to go with Ana's suggestion.

You can test it by creating a github PAT, running terriajs-server using this PAT and a GitHub repo in the feedback configuration and either faking a POST to /feedback or substituting your branch of terriajs-server into TerriaMap (using packages) and using the feedback button.

[staffordsmith83]

Great, thanks @steve9164

[zoran995]

Just an idea for the referer what about using it as a label, then it will also be visible at first but won't pollute the title and can be easily filtered on it