Skip to content

avoid exposing asyncio.Future directly to api consumers #5765

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

graingert
Copy link

@graingert graingert commented Apr 24, 2025

This avoids exposing an 'asyncio.Future' to api consumers - instead returning an awaitable object wrapping an Event and a Result.

  • This should fix an issue where cancellation would result in an invalid state error
  • This work is needed for Feature Suggestions #3 (comment) where asyncio Futures do not work with the trio backend.

Please review the following checklist.

I didn't see any documentation for this feature outside docstrings, it's probably worth a note in the changelog

  • Docstrings on all new or modified functions / classes
  • Updated documentation
  • Updated CHANGELOG.md (where appropriate)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant