Skip to content

chore(deps): update pre-commit hook coverage to v7.16.0 - #778

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/coverage-7.x
Open

chore(deps): update pre-commit hook coverage to v7.16.0#778
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/coverage-7.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
coverage ==7.15.4==7.16.0 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.

Note: The pre-commit manager in Renovate is not supported by the pre-commit maintainers or community. Please do not report any problems there, instead create a Discussion in the Renovate repository if you have any questions.


Release Notes

coveragepy/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.16.0

Compare Source

  • When combining files, now path separator slashes will automatically be
    converted to the local file system style. This makes it less necessary to
    define [paths] configuration to combine data across operating systems.
    Fixes issue 2266_.

  • The :meth:.Coverage.switch_context method now returns the previous context.

  • Fix: previously, a [paths] pattern would be replaced everywhere in a file
    path when it was only meant to be replaced once, in the leading portion of
    the path. This is now fixed, in pull 2268_.

  • Fixes to validation of options and configuration settings:

    • Negative precision settings now always cause useful error messages (pull 2261_).

    • An invalid regex in the --contexts option (or the [report] contexts setting) reported a confusing "Couldn't use data file ...:
      user-defined function raised exception" error. Now it raises a proper
      configuration error naming the bad regex, like other regex settings do
      (pull 2262_).

    • Non-string values in TOML configuration settings now produce a helpful
      error message instead of a traceback. This affects list settings whose
      elements aren't strings (like omit, exclude_lines, or a [paths]
      entry), file settings like data_file, and any wrong-typed value in the
      [paths] section (pull 2263_).

    • coverage run refuses run-affecting command-line options like
      --branch alongside --concurrency=multiprocessing, since they can't
      reach the subprocesses. The check only recognized multiprocessing as
      the entire option value, so --concurrency=multiprocessing,thread
      slipped through and failed later with "Can't combine statement coverage
      data with branch data". Each named concurrency library is now properly
      considered (pull 2270_).

  • Fix: coverage annotate -d DIR raised an AssertionError if any
    measured file had an extension other than .py, such as a .pyw file on
    Windows. The original extension is now restored on the annotated copy (pull 2265_).

.. _pull 2261: #​2261
.. _pull 2262: #​2262
.. _pull 2263: #​2263
.. _pull 2265: #​2265
.. _issue 2266: #​2266
.. _pull 2268: #​2268
.. _pull 2270: #​2270

.. _changes_7-15-4:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the task label Aug 29, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from TheKevJames as a code owner August 29, 2026 02:44

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved 👍

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants