docs: reconcile version history (v3.0.1)

[Thomo1318]

User description

Updates VERSION_HISTORY.md and cleans up TASKS.md.

---

PR Type

Documentation

---

Description

• Restructured TASKS.md from detailed task tracking to concise roadmap format

• Reorganized content into immediate roadmap (v3.1.0-v3.2.0), future vision (v4.0.0-v5.0.0), and completed tasks archive

• Simplified version history entry for v3.0.0 with clearer feature descriptions

• Improved readability with emoji headers and streamlined task descriptions

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["TASKS.md<br/>Old Format"] -- "Consolidate & Reorganize" --> B["TASKS.md<br/>New Roadmap"]
  C["VERSION_HISTORY.md<br/>v3.0.0 Entry"] -- "Clarify Features" --> D["VERSION_HISTORY.md<br/>Updated Entry"]
  B -- "Immediate Roadmap" --> E["v3.1.0-v3.2.0"]
  B -- "Future Vision" --> F["v4.0.0-v5.0.0"]
  B -- "Completed Archive" --> G["v1.0.0-v3.0.0"]

Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Documentation

TASKS.md Consolidate tasks into concise roadmap format                        TASKS.md Transformed from 336 lines of detailed task tracking to 82 lines of streamlined roadmap Reorganized into three sections: Immediate Roadmap (v3.1.0-v3.2.0), Future Vision (v4.0.0-v5.0.0), and Completed Tasks Archive Removed verbose task descriptions, priority labels, and implementation details Added emoji headers (🚀, 🔮, ✅) for visual hierarchy and quick scanning Consolidated future versions into high-level feature descriptions with checkbox lists +46/-300 VERSION_HISTORY.md Clarify v3.0.0 features and add pager upgrade                        backups/VERSION_HISTORY.md Updated v3.0.0 entry to clarify Conventional Commits implementation (removed validation tool reference) Added UI enhancement note about delta pager upgrade Improved feature descriptions for better clarity and consistency +2/-1

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Pager upgraded to delta, delivering enhanced diff visualisation with improved formatting and readability.

• Changes

  • Conventional Commits functionality streamlined to focus on commit template capabilities.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation files have been restructured to transition from a task-focused format to a versioned roadmap. The main file is rebranded with new sections for immediate roadmap items, completed archive, and future vision, whilst version history has been updated to reflect implementation details of v3.0.0 features.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Reorganisation TASKS.md	Restructured from pending tasks to versioned roadmap; replaced "Immediate Tasks" with "🚀 Immediate Roadmap"; introduced v3.0.0–v4.0.0 milestone entries; archived legacy tasks and added new sections for completed items and future vision; replaced granular action items with higher-level strategic descriptions.
Version History Update backups/VERSION_HISTORY.md	Updated v3.0.0-conventional entry to reflect that Conventional Commits feature now includes template only (removed commitlint validation); added pager upgrade note (delta integration for rich diffs).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Poem

🐰 A roadmap so clear, with versions galore,
From tasks turned to tales of what came before,
With milestones and visions all neatly arrayed,
The pathway ahead has been mapped and displayed! 🚀

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e7d7f17 and fdb1cf1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• TASKS.md
• backups/VERSION_HISTORY.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[qodo-code-review]

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
High-level	Archive detailed notes before deletion Instead of deleting the detailed content from TASKS.md, archive it in a separate document or wiki. This preserves valuable project history, research, and implementation details for future reference. Examples: TASKS.md [1-82] # JJ Configuration - Roadmap & Tasks ## 🚀 Immediate Roadmap ### v3.1.0 - Documentation Site **Priority:** High **Status:** Planned Transition static markdown files to a searchable, beautiful static site. ... (clipped 72 lines) Solution Walkthrough: Before: # TASKS.md (before) -## TODO Items - -### TODO 1: Assess Raycast AI MCP Integration - -**Priority:** Medium -**Version:** TBD -**Status:** Research needed - -**Question:** Can Raycast AI automatically use `.mcp/context.json` files for repo context? - -**Action Items:** - -- [ ] Check Raycast AI documentation for MCP support -- [ ] Test if Raycast AI can read local `.mcp/` files ... (and many other detailed task descriptions) After: # TASKS.md (after) +# JJ Configuration - Roadmap & Tasks + +## 🚀 Immediate Roadmap +### v3.1.0 - Documentation Site +- [ ] Evaluate Static Site Generators (MkDocs-Material recommended) ... +## 🔮 Future Vision +### v4.0.0 - Advanced Security & Insights ... # (Suggested) docs/archive/tasks_history.md ## Task Research & Implementation Notes ### Assess Raycast AI MCP Integration **Question:** Can Raycast AI automatically use `.mcp/context.json` files? ... (archived content) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: This is a valuable suggestion that addresses a significant loss of project knowledge resulting from the TASKS.md refactoring, improving long-term maintainability without being a critical bug.	Medium
General	Align version features with other documentation Align the key features for version v3.0.0 in backups/VERSION_HISTORY.md with the information in TASKS.md to ensure documentation consistency. backups/VERSION_HISTORY.md [49-54] **Key Features:** -- **Conventional Commits**: `jj describe` template & `commitlint` validation (Gold Standard). -+ **Conventional Commits**: `jj describe` template (Gold Standard). +- **Conventional Commits**: `jj describe` template (Gold Standard). - **Trunk Optimization**: Added `ruff` (Python), `codespell` (Typos), and `trivy` (Security). -+ **UI**: Upgrade pager to `delta` for rich diffs. - **Documentation**: Updated `usage.md` and `CONTRIBUTING.md`. Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies inconsistencies between backups/VERSION_HISTORY.md and TASKS.md introduced by the PR, which harms documentation quality and maintainability.	Medium
More