Pipeline performance logging - #345
Open
chrisarridge wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
…run test The multiple getter run per day test uses random dates and this appears to be producing random test failures in GitHub Actions. Since these tests invariably run okay locally, this commit changes these dates to be fixed.
Add performance monitoring to blocks in the pipeline bash script so that we can log the performance of different parts of the pipeline to a CSV file for analysis.
jwilson232
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2026
Contributor
|
@chrisarridge does |
Contributor
Author
Yes it does, I have the necessary changes on a local branch. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds some performance monitoring to the pipeline run script so we can measure the run-time of different parts of the pipeline.
Note, this PR is built on #343 which should be reviewed and merged first, then this PR rebased before merging.