Skip to content

Update Rust crate tar to v0.4.46 [SECURITY]#2378

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/crate-tar-vulnerability
Open

Update Rust crate tar to v0.4.46 [SECURITY]#2378
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/crate-tar-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 29, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
tar dev-dependencies patch 0.4.450.4.46

tar has a PAX header desynchronization issue

GHSA-3pv8-6f4r-ffg2

More information

Details

Summary

When a tar stream contains multiple "header" entries prior to a file entry, tar-rs applies the PAX header (x) to the next entry in the stream, regardless of type. For example, a stream of x -> L -> file (PAX, GNU longname, file) would result in x's extensions being applied to L rather than to file.

Per POSIX pax, this is incorrect: a PAX header always applies to a file entry, not any intermediary entries. See the "pax Header Block" section for the specific prescription there.

As a result of this, an attacker can contrive a tar containing a sequence of tar headers such that tar-rs applies the PAX header's size extension to the next header in sequence, effectively desynchronizing the stream and enabling tar-rs specific skippage/extraction of members. In other words, a file can be contrived to extract differently on tar-rs than on other tar parsers.

PoC

This tar (zipped for size) demonstrates the desynchronization: with tar tvf:

% tar tvf tests/archives/pax-overrides-extension-header.tar 
----------  0 0      0        2048 Dec 31  1969 longname.txt
----------  0 0      0           0 Dec 31  1969 file_b

with tar-rs:

---- pax_size_does_not_apply_to_extension_headers stdout ----

thread 'pax_size_does_not_apply_to_extension_headers' (250476889) panicked at tests/all.rs:2121:27:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Custom { kind: Other, error: "numeric field was not a number: AAAAAAAA when getting cksum for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" }
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

In the above case, the PoC is not weaponized, so it jumps into the middle of an entry and subsequently fails the checksum test rather than silently continuing with attacker-controlled archive state.

Impact

This is very similar to GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx and GHSA-fp55-jw48-c537 in impact -- an attacker can use this to extract (or not extract) files from a tar stream depending on the tar parser used, which in turn can be used to obscure the presence of malicious files.

Severity

Medium

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


tar has a PAX header desynchronization issue

GHSA-3pv8-6f4r-ffg2

More information

Details

Summary

When a tar stream contains multiple "header" entries prior to a file entry, tar-rs applies the PAX header (x) to the next entry in the stream, regardless of type. For example, a stream of x -> L -> file (PAX, GNU longname, file) would result in x's extensions being applied to L rather than to file.

Per POSIX pax, this is incorrect: a PAX header always applies to a file entry, not any intermediary entries. See the "pax Header Block" section for the specific prescription there.

As a result of this, an attacker can contrive a tar containing a sequence of tar headers such that tar-rs applies the PAX header's size extension to the next header in sequence, effectively desynchronizing the stream and enabling tar-rs specific skippage/extraction of members. In other words, a file can be contrived to extract differently on tar-rs than on other tar parsers.

PoC

This tar (zipped for size) demonstrates the desynchronization: with tar tvf:

% tar tvf tests/archives/pax-overrides-extension-header.tar 
----------  0 0      0        2048 Dec 31  1969 longname.txt
----------  0 0      0           0 Dec 31  1969 file_b

with tar-rs:

---- pax_size_does_not_apply_to_extension_headers stdout ----

thread 'pax_size_does_not_apply_to_extension_headers' (250476889) panicked at tests/all.rs:2121:27:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Custom { kind: Other, error: "numeric field was not a number: AAAAAAAA when getting cksum for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" }
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

In the above case, the PoC is not weaponized, so it jumps into the middle of an entry and subsequently fails the checksum test rather than silently continuing with attacker-controlled archive state.

Impact

This is very similar to GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx and GHSA-fp55-jw48-c537 in impact -- an attacker can use this to extract (or not extract) files from a tar stream depending on the tar parser used, which in turn can be used to obscure the presence of malicious files.

Severity

Moderate

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

composefs/tar-rs (tar)

v0.4.46

Compare Source

Security

See also GHSA-3cv2-h65g-fgmm

Other changes

New Contributors

Full Changelog: composefs/tar-rs@0.4.45...0.4.46


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • ""
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.


This change is Reviewable

@renovate renovate Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) May 29, 2026 21:19
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 29, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
nativelink Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 30, 2026 1:42am
nativelink-aidm Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 30, 2026 1:42am

Request Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants