Adding failing test for Issue #272

[kevindugan]

This PR adds regression tests for Issue #272. These tests fail without the changes implemented in PR #273 and pass when those changes are applied.

[kevindugan]

@bartlettroscoe I placed these tests in the User Error Package, but would it be better to create a new 'PkgRegressions' package? I didn't want to change the structure too much for these tests, but I'll admit it seems a little strange to put valid package declarations in something testing for user errors.

[bartlettroscoe]

@kevindugan, does this PR fix the usage of TriBITS by VERA?

[kevindugan]

@bartlettroscoe This PR only addresses the testing of the changes I made in the previous PR (#273). I still need to find a solution to the VERA/MOOSE problem I'm having.

On a related issue, we're seeing debug/optimized tags leaking into the libraries we're linking to. I've found where these tags are added for certain libraries (HDF5, I think). Is it possible that these tags aren't getting removed from another library, Qt maybe?

[bartlettroscoe]

This PR only addresses the testing of the changes I made in the previous PR (#273). I still need to find a solution to the VERA/MOOSE problem I'm having.

@kevindugan, okay, then lets address the real problem in getting VERA to work. In issue #272, can you please attach the full CMakeLists.txt file where this error is triggered and then attach the full configure output? Otherwise, I will need to get back my access to ORNL so that I can see what is happening myself. Let's discuss in issue #272.