[WIP] Changes related to data pipeline/workflow

[abelsiqueira]

Related issues

Closes #

Checklist

• I am following the contributing guidelines
• Tests are passing
• Lint workflow is passing
• Docs were updated and workflow is passing

[github-actions]

⌛ Running MPS comparison

Please wait.

🤖 This was CompareMPS, we hope you have enjoyed this program.

[github-actions]

⚠️ MPS files differ

What to do?

👍 If this is expected

Then you just have to update the MPS files running from the root of TulipaEnergyModel.jl:

julia --project=. utils/scripts/model-mps-update.jl

👎 This is bad

Then, review the log below to figure out why the files differ:

┌ Info: New comparison
│ Comparing files
│ - /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/../../benchmark/model-mps-folder/Multi-year Investments.mps
│ - /tmp/jl_WOZzMc/Multi-year Investments.mps
└ @ Main /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/model-mps-compare.jl:29
┌ Info: Create mps for /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/../../test/inputs/Multi-year Investments in /tmp/jl_WOZzMc
└ @ Main /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/model-mps-compare.jl:34

For more details about this workflow, check https://tulipaenergy.github.io/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/dev/91-developer/#Testing-the-generate-MPS-files.

🤖 This was CompareMPS, we hope you have enjoyed this program.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.62%. Comparing base (8f8e6eb) to head (c2a5d0b).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/io.jl	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (86.66%) is below the target coverage (95.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1150      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.78%   97.62%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        1131     1135       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         1106     1108       +2     
- Misses         25       27       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

⚠️ MPS files differ

What to do?

👍 If this is expected

Then you just have to update the MPS files running from the root of TulipaEnergyModel.jl:

julia --project=. utils/scripts/model-mps-update.jl

👎 This is bad

Then, review the log below to figure out why the files differ:

┌ Info: New comparison
│ Comparing files
│ - /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/../../benchmark/model-mps-folder/Multi-year Investments.mps
│ - /tmp/jl_59xHYG/Multi-year Investments.mps
└ @ Main /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/model-mps-compare.jl:29
┌ Info: Create mps for /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/../../test/inputs/Multi-year Investments in /tmp/jl_59xHYG
└ @ Main /home/runner/work/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/utils/scripts/model-mps-compare.jl:34

For more details about this workflow, check https://tulipaenergy.github.io/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/dev/91-developer/#Testing-the-generate-MPS-files.

🤖 This was CompareMPS, we hope you have enjoyed this program.