Refactor HMC initialisation code#2567
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Turing.jl documentation for PR #2567 is available at: |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2567 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.92% 85.86% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 1428 1429 +1
==========================================
Hits 1227 1227
- Misses 201 202 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15307178307Details
💛 - Coveralls |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm really wary of #2566 becoming very big, so I'm trying to break off smaller bits.
This is a really basic bit of refactoring that I think just makes things easier to read.
Anyway, I've tested before and after with
and the exact numerical result is unchanged, so I'm pretty sure that there isn't actually any code change — hence the lack of a version bump.