[TT-16932] CVE-2026-39883 Fix #8081
+22
−22
Merged
probelabs / Visor: quality
failed
Apr 17, 2026 in 1m 41s
🚨 Check Failed
quality check failed because fail_if condition was met.
Details
📊 Summary
- Total Issues: 4
- Error Issues: 2
- Warning Issues: 2
🔍 Failure Condition Results
Failed Conditions
- global_fail_if: output.issues && output.issues.some(i => i.severity === 'critical' || i.severity === 'error')
- Severity: ❌ error
Issues by Category
Documentation (1)
- ❌ go.mod:1 - The pull request description is empty. It fails to explain the context for the dependency upgrades, such as the specific CVE being addressed (the title's CVE is for a future year), the rationale behind the version choices, and critically, how these changes were tested. Given that OpenTelemetry is a cross-cutting concern for observability, the lack of a testing description is a significant omission.
Architecture (2)
⚠️ go.mod:3 - The Go version is updated from1.24.6to1.25.0without any explanation. It is unclear if this change is required by the updated dependencies or if it is an unrelated toolchain upgrade. Bundling unrelated changes complicates review and future maintenance.⚠️ go.mod:576 - Thereplacedirective forgo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpspecifically targets versionv0.60.0. This is brittle; if a future dependency update requires a different version ofotelhttp, this line will require another manual update. Furthermore, there is no comment explaining why this package is being pinned tov0.49.0.
Logic (1)
- ❌ system:0 - Global failure condition met: output.issues && output.issues.some(i => i.severity === 'critical' || i.severity === 'error')
Powered by Visor from Probelabs
💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using /visor ask <your question>
Annotations
Check failure on line 1 in go.mod
probelabs / Visor: quality
documentation Issue
The pull request description is empty. It fails to explain the context for the dependency upgrades, such as the specific CVE being addressed (the title's CVE is for a future year), the rationale behind the version choices, and critically, how these changes were tested. Given that OpenTelemetry is a cross-cutting concern for observability, the lack of a testing description is a significant omission.
Raw output
Update the pull request description to provide comprehensive details. This should include: a valid reference to the security vulnerability being fixed, an explanation for why these specific dependency versions were chosen, and a detailed account of the testing performed (e.g., unit tests, integration tests, manual validation) to ensure the upgrade does not introduce regressions.
Check warning on line 3 in go.mod
probelabs / Visor: quality
architecture Issue
The Go version is updated from `1.24.6` to `1.25.0` without any explanation. It is unclear if this change is required by the updated dependencies or if it is an unrelated toolchain upgrade. Bundling unrelated changes complicates review and future maintenance.
Raw output
Explain the reason for the Go version bump in the pull request description. If this update is not strictly necessary for the CVE fix, consider moving it to a separate pull request to follow the single responsibility principle for commits and PRs.
Check warning on line 576 in go.mod
probelabs / Visor: quality
architecture Issue
The `replace` directive for `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp` specifically targets version `v0.60.0`. This is brittle; if a future dependency update requires a different version of `otelhttp`, this line will require another manual update. Furthermore, there is no comment explaining why this package is being pinned to `v0.49.0`.
Raw output
To make the directive more robust, remove the version from the left-hand side: `replace go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp => go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp v0.49.0`. Additionally, add a comment above the `replace` directive explaining why this specific version is required, which will improve maintainability.
Loading