Creating default print methods for class sr_model

[sschildhauer]

I am creating a default print methods for sr_model using the S3 object system. The default print provides the mean value of the posterior distribution for each parameter and all stratification iso_type combinations.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
R/print.sr_model.R	94.73%	1 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
R/Run_Mod.R	100.00% <ø> (ø)
R/print.sr_model.R	94.73% <94.73%> (ø)

[github-actions]

📖 https://ucd-serg.github.io/serodynamics/preview/pr114
Preview documentation for this PR (at commit c6de84f)

[sschildhauer]

I am a little confused with the warning/error I am getting here. It looks like there is a scoping issue relating to the base dataset when using dplyr, but when I fix the issue the tests are producing a warning. It seems like the solution might be in conflicting with each other. Grateful for any help!

[sschildhauer]

Hi Ezra and Kwan. I checked the snaps and having a hard time finding a solution. It looks like the test for print.sr_model in the github review is producing different median values than when I run the function locally. There also seems to be something going on with autoplot.case_data documention -- this is a new issue and has me stumped as well. Thank you so much for review. These should almost be there!

[d-morrison]

@sschildhauer re: the document error: ggplot2 recently updated to v4.0 and changed a lot of stuff, including documentation, which the documentation for autoplot.case_data() depends on.

Please update ggplot2 and its dependencies on your local machine and re-run document(); once you do that, the changes you introduced in autoplot.case_data.Rd will hopefully go away.

[d-morrison]

@sschildhauer PS - I bet updating ggplot2 will also resolve the snapshot discrepancies; feel free to re-ping me if you're still stuck after that.

[sschildhauer]

@Kwan-Jenny , can you also take a quick look at this when you get a chance? I recently created an option in the print to make the output similar to that of print.tbl_df.