A first few seed-project statements #57
Conversation
samcunliffe
moved this from Backlog
to Ready
in OSPO Business Case (and peripheral items)
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚫 [vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶
[proselint.Annotations] 'TODO' left in text.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚫 [vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶
[proselint.Very] Remove 'very'.
samcunliffe
moved this from Ready
to In review
in OSPO Business Case (and peripheral items)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR enhances the OSPO business case document by adding concrete evidence from a recent study of UCL's open-source projects. The additions support the case for establishing an Open Source Programme Office by providing quantitative data about UCL's existing open-source ecosystem and highlighting specific risks such as unlicensed projects.
Key changes include:
- Addition of a new "Context" section with historical data about UCL's open-source projects dating back to 1997
- Inclusion of specific study findings (1000+ projects, 36.1% unlicensed) to strengthen the legal risk mitigation argument
- Minor spelling and formatting corrections throughout the document
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
Why change the base to |
Following the Augur/8Knot, Grimoire, etc work.
We can already make a few statements that might help the case.
Edit @dpshelio Might as well review/merge this rather than leave it hanging around.