Establish relationship between Product and Inventory#30
Closed
Oriol-Farras wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
rogargon
reviewed
Oct 9, 2025
| private String location; | ||
|
|
||
| private int totalStock; | ||
|
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No need to implement this side of the relationship. Just need the ManyToOne side that is easier to persist into a relational database. The other side can be generated using a findByInventory method in the ProductRepository
rogargon
requested changes
Oct 9, 2025
rogargon
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please, addres my comment about the OneToMany relationship...
Member
|
Closing this PR as it will be addressed by the group working with the Product class. They had already modelled their side of the relationship, but it was commented |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.