Skip to content

unpin pdfminer-six #415

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

unpin pdfminer-six #415

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

badGarnet
Copy link
Collaborator

  • higher versions can have bugs that user have reported
  • unpin it in the base.in so leaves other packages and user's constrains to resolve it

@badGarnet
unpin pdfminer-six
ab65e29 
- higher versions can have bugs that user have reported
- unpin it in the base.in so leaves other packages and user's constrains
  to resolve it
@badGarnet badGarnet requested a review from Coniferish March 5, 2025 21:54
@badGarnet badGarnet marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 21:57
@badGarnet badGarnet requested a review from tbs17 March 5, 2025 22:11
Coniferish
Coniferish approved these changes Mar 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Coniferish Coniferish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving in advance of checks passing, but LGTM

@badGarnet badGarnet enabled auto-merge (squash) March 5, 2025 22:14
@badGarnet badGarnet merged commit 5ea3895 into main Mar 5, 2025
14 checks passed
@badGarnet badGarnet deleted the chore/unpin-pdfminer-six branch March 5, 2025 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Coniferish Coniferish Coniferish approved these changes

@tbs17 tbs17 Awaiting requested review from tbs17

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@badGarnet @Coniferish