- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 110
Handle Kotlin's statements and their frequent sugar #472
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    …"do" statements # Conflicts: # plugins/kotlin/src/main/java/org/vineflower/kotlin/stat/KDoStatement.java # plugins/kotlin/testData/results/pkg/TestForRange.dec # plugins/kotlin/testData/results/pkg/TestFunVarargs.dec # plugins/kotlin/testData/results/pkg/TestNonInlineLambda.dec
I should look into this more and see why it's seemingly quite inconsistent
…ny ways they're used
This existed prior to the rebase, but something went amiss and I'm not quite sure what
This also fixes a potential issue where `repeat` would be generated despite counting down
              
                    jaskarth
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Aug 14, 2025 
                  
              
              
            
            
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine. Thanks a lot!
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    Priority: Medium
  Medium priority 
  
    Subsystem: Writing
  Anything concerning how expressions are written 
  
    Type: Enhancement
  New feature or request 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
This introduces large improvements to the structure of Kotlin decompilation. It gets rid of most (all?) incorrectly formatted labels, breaks, and continues, and it provides some support for
whenstatements (those which compile to tableswitch and lookupswitch instructions).This does make a couple small changes to the main Vineflower source.
It adds an additional getter in
SwitchHeadExprent:vineflower/src/org/jetbrains/java/decompiler/modules/decompiler/exps/SwitchHeadExprent.java
Lines 145 to 147 in ab201e0
It also makes a visibility change in
ExprProcessor(privatetopublic):vineflower/src/org/jetbrains/java/decompiler/modules/decompiler/ExprProcessor.java
Line 817 in ab201e0
All other changes are Kotlin-specific.