-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
#276 scenario restoration #297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: src-data
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
185977c
a9c4e84
90309ed
aaed1f1
58966f2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-h-aer", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-h-Aer", | ||
| "ui-label": "Future scenario esm-scen7-h with high aerosol emissions", | ||
| "description": "1. Detailed experiment configuration Future scenario esm-scen7-h with higher aerosol emissions 2. Required model settings We encourage modelling centres to include as much atmospheric composition capability as possible. As a minimum, models should have prescribed or interactive aerosols. And the experimental setup should be consistent with other scenario experiments. 3. Experiment conditions 4. Links to relevant references Fiedler et al. (in prep.) AerChemMIP2 - Unraveling the role of reactive gases, aerosols, and land use for air quality and climate change in CMIP7 5. Similarities to CMIP6 experiments None 6. Forcing differences from parent experiment Increased aerosol emissions compared to parent.", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "aerchemmip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "minimum-number-of-years": "104", | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably assuming a 2125 end, which doesn't work as the scenarios don't go that far so needs checking?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. at one point the scenarios were being specified as running out to 2125 as there was some reason for requiring a minimum 100 year extent. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmm ok I guess that's something that would need double checking before locking in |
||
| "model-realms": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aer", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aogcm", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "chem", | ||
| "is-required": false | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start-date": "2022", | ||
| "tier": "1", | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same comments as for |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-h-aq", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-h-AQ", | ||
| "ui-label": "Future scenario esm-scen7-h with high aerosol and tropospheric non-methane ozone precursor emissions", | ||
| "description": "1. Detailed experiment configuration Future scenario esm-scen7-h with higher aerosol and tropospheric non-methane ozone precursor emissions 2. Required model settings We encourage modelling centres to include as much atmospheric composition capability as possible. But, as a minimum, models should have tropospheric chemistry and interactive aerosols. And the experimental setup should be consistent with other scenario experiments. 3. Experiment conditions 4. Links to relevant references Fiedler et al. (in prep.) AerChemMIP2 - Unraveling the role of reactive gases, aerosols, and land use for air quality and climate change in CMIP7 5. Similarities to CMIP6 experiments None 6. Forcing differences from parent experiment Increased aerosol and tropospheric non-methane ozone precursor emissions compared to parent.", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "aerchemmip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "minimum-number-of-years": "104", | ||
| "model-realms": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aer", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aogcm", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "chem", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": "1", | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Extensions haven't been decided yet as far as I know so we can't add any of these extension experiment descriptions yet. If I'm wrong, do we have a link that points to the final extension choices (my understanding was this
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will wait on a response from ScenarioMIP on this |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-h-ext-os", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-h-ext-os", | ||
| "ui-label": "High Scenario Overshoot Extension", | ||
| "description": "High emission scenario overshoot extension to explore potential high-end impacts", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2500, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 50, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-scen7-h" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2101, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-h-ext", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-h-ext", | ||
| "ui-label": "High Scenario Extension", | ||
| "description": "High emission scenario extension to explore potential high-end impacts", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2500, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 50, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-scen7-h" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2101, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-h", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-h", | ||
| "ui-label": "High Scenario", | ||
| "description": "High emission scenario to explore potential high-end impacts", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2100, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 79, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2022, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-l-ext", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-l-ext", | ||
| "ui-label": "Low Scenario Extension", | ||
| "description": "Scenario extension consistent with staying likely below 2 degrees C", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2500, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 50, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-scen7-l" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2101, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-l", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-l", | ||
| "ui-label": "Low Scenario", | ||
| "description": "Scenario consistent with staying likely below 2 degrees C", | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These all need to be updated in line with the ScenarioMIP paper. As I understand it, the descriptions are moving away from talking about temperature targets and towards talking about emissions (which is what the scenarios control, the temperature outcomes will be determined by the ESMs)
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've asked for an up to date version of the tables in the ScenarioMIP paper so that we can adjust these. |
||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2100, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 79, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2022, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same comments as for |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-ln-aer", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-ln-Aer", | ||
| "ui-label": "Future scenario esm-scen7-ln with high aerosol emissions", | ||
| "description": "1. Detailed experiment configuration Future scenario esm-scen7-ln with higher aerosol emissions 2. Required model settings We encourage modelling centres to include as much atmospheric composition capability as possible. As a minimum, models should have prescribed or interactive aerosols. And the experimental setup should be consistent with other scenario experiments. 3. Experiment conditions 4. Links to relevant references Fiedler et al. (in prep.) AerChemMIP2 - Unraveling the role of reactive gases, aerosols, and land use for air quality and climate change in CMIP7 5. Similarities to CMIP6 experiments None 6. Forcing differences from parent experiment Increased aerosol emissions compared to parent.", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "aerchemmip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "minimum-number-of-years": "104", | ||
| "model-realms": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aer", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aogcm", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": "1", | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same comments as for |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-ln-aq", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-vlho-AQ", | ||
| "ui-label": "Future scenario esm-scen7-ln with high aerosol and tropospheric non-methane ozone precursor emissions", | ||
| "description": "1. Detailed experiment configuration Future scenario esm-scen7-ln with higher aerosol and tropospheric non-methane ozone precursor emissions 2. Required model settings We encourage modelling centres to include as much atmospheric composition capability as possible. But, as a minimum, models should have tropospheric chemistry and interactive aerosols. And the experimental setup should be consistent with other scenario experiments. 3. Experiment conditions 4. Links to relevant references Fiedler et al. (in prep.) AerChemMIP2 - Unraveling the role of reactive gases, aerosols, and land use for air quality and climate change in CMIP7 5. Similarities to CMIP6 experiments none 6. Forcing differences from parent experiment Increased aerosol and ozone precursor emissions compared to parent.", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "aerchemmip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "minimum-number-of-years": "104", | ||
| "model-realms": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aer", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "aogcm", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "chem", | ||
| "is-required": true | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start-date": "2022", | ||
| "tier": "1", | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-ln-ext", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-ln-ext", | ||
| "ui-label": "Very Low Scenario with Limited Overshoot Extension", | ||
| "description": "Extension to scenario with similar end-of-century temperature impact to VL, but with less aggressive near-term mitigation and large reliance on net negative emissions, resulting in a higher overshoot.", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2500, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 50, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-scen7-ln" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2101, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-ln", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-ln", | ||
| "ui-label": "Very Low Scenario after High Overshoot", | ||
| "description": "Scenario with similar endof-century temperature impact to VL, but with less aggressive near-term mitigation and large reliance on net negative emissions, resulting in a higher overshoot.", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2100, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 79, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2022, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-m-ext", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-m-ext", | ||
| "ui-label": "Medium Scenario Extension", | ||
| "description": "Medium emission scenario extension consistent with current policies", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2500, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 50, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-scen7-m" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2101, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-m", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-m", | ||
| "ui-label": "Medium Scenario", | ||
| "description": "Medium emission scenario consistent with current policies", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2100, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 79, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-hist" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2022, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "esm-scen7-ml-ext", | ||
| "validation-key": "esm-scen7-ml-ext", | ||
| "ui-label": "Medium Low Scenario Extension", | ||
| "description": "Extension to scenario with delayed increase in mitigation effort, insufficient to meet Paris Agreement objectives", | ||
| "activity": [ | ||
| "scenariomip" | ||
| ], | ||
| "alias": [], | ||
| "end": 2500, | ||
| "min-number-yrs-per-sim": 50, | ||
| "model-realms": [], | ||
| "parent-experiment": [ | ||
| "esm-scen7-ml" | ||
| ], | ||
| "start": 2101, | ||
| "start-date": "none", | ||
| "tier": 0, | ||
| "@context": "_context_", | ||
| "type": [ | ||
| "wcrp:experiment", | ||
| "cmip7" | ||
| ] | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Not your issue @matthew-mizielinski, but) This description is quite vague. I would be tempted to go back to the AerChemMIP chairs to see if they want to quantify what 'higher' means exactly and which forcing dataset modelling teams should use for this before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you be happy if the description field was blanked out and a separate issue was raised to cover this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm it breaks the idea of freezing the CVs, which Guillaume was very keen on to start to build a sense of stability. I could live with it, but I would lean towards letting the CVs TT decide unless you have strong feelings.