add lneto as an alternative to gvisor in netstack package#149
Open
soypat wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
@zx2c4 Let me know what I can do to help this along :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Main API changes:
go.modversion 1.23 -> 1.24.go tidyforces this version, likely needed for using lneto due to the use oftesting.B.Loop:/CreateNetTUNselects a stack based on build tagCreateNetTUNGvisorby default is wrapped (New API)CreateNetTUNLnetois called instead with build tagwglnetonetstackdebugbuild tag for debugging. I'm not particularily vouching for this to be included, was useful for debugging. We can remove it if is not desired.Added following interfaces to replace gvisor types.
Stackis now an interface instead of a struct to better document what is needed to implement a networking stack for use in wireguard.