Skip to content

Update experiments description to include AI provider model supports#377

Open
theskinnyghost wants to merge 1 commit intoWordPress:developfrom
theskinnyghost:enhancement/ai-model-type-reqs
Open

Update experiments description to include AI provider model supports#377
theskinnyghost wants to merge 1 commit intoWordPress:developfrom
theskinnyghost:enhancement/ai-model-type-reqs

Conversation

@theskinnyghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@theskinnyghost theskinnyghost commented Apr 8, 2026

What?

Closes #335

Updates the description of all existing experiments to include a note about what feature the AI provider should support (e.g. text generation).

Testing Instructions

  1. Open the Settings > AI admin page
  2. Verify all experiments in the "Editor Experiments" section include a description and the description outlines which feature the AI provider should support.
Open WordPress Playground Preview

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Unlinked Accounts

The following contributors have not linked their GitHub and WordPress.org accounts: @raftaar1191.

Contributors, please read how to link your accounts to ensure your work is properly credited in WordPress releases.

If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Unlinked contributors: raftaar1191.

Co-authored-by: theskinnyghost <theskinnyghost@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: jeffpaul <jeffpaul@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: dkotter <dkotter@git.wordpress.org>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.63%. Comparing base (ffd1eb4) to head (e23ef28).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop     #377   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      62.63%   62.63%           
  Complexity       680      680           
==========================================
  Files             49       49           
  Lines           3501     3501           
==========================================
  Hits            2193     2193           
  Misses          1308     1308           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 62.63% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jeffpaul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jeffpaul commented Apr 8, 2026

Perhaps the alt text one should be "vision-based image analysis." instead of just "vision." to be a bit more descriptive? Alternatively we adjust these to be "Requires and AI provider that includes a model-type model."?

@jeffpaul jeffpaul requested a review from dkotter April 8, 2026 15:55
@jeffpaul jeffpaul added this to the 0.8.0 milestone Apr 8, 2026
@dkotter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

dkotter commented Apr 8, 2026

Perhaps the alt text one should be "vision-based image analysis." instead of just "vision." to be a bit more descriptive? Alternatively we adjust these to be "Requires and AI provider that includes a model-type model."?

I don't have any strong preference on wording here but as far as I'm aware, "vision" in the model sense will always refer to image analysis, not sure there's a "vision" model that doesn't support that. That said, I wouldn't expect the average WordPress user to understand that so being more specific isn't a bad thing. I'd probably suggest the latter there, maybe also changing provider to connector:

Requires an AI connector that includes support for vision models.

Requires an AI connector that includes supports for text generation models.

Requires an AI connector that includes support for image generation models.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Display AI model type requirements for each experiment

3 participants