Skip to content

4.3.0 release#3006

Merged
khancode merged 2 commits intomainfrom
4.3.0-release
Jun 9, 2025
Merged

4.3.0 release#3006
khancode merged 2 commits intomainfrom
4.3.0-release

Conversation

@khancode
Copy link
Contributor

@khancode khancode commented Jun 9, 2025

High Level Overview of Change

4.3.0 release

Context of Change

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Tests (You added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation Updates
  • Release

Did you update HISTORY.md?

  • Yes
  • No, this change does not impact library users

Test Plan

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This change adds new released version entries for 2.4.0 in ripple-binary-codec and 4.3.0 in xrpl to their respective changelog files, both dated June 9, 2025. The package versions were updated accordingly, and the xrpl package updated its dependency on ripple-binary-codec to the new version. No other code or metadata changes were made.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/ripple-binary-codec/HISTORY.md Added released version entry for 2.4.0 (2025-06-09)
packages/xrpl/HISTORY.md Added released version entry for 4.3.0 (2025-06-09)
packages/ripple-binary-codec/package.json Updated package version from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0
packages/xrpl/package.json Updated package version from 4.2.5 to 4.3.0; upgraded ripple-binary-codec dependency from ^2.3.0 to ^2.4.0

Possibly related PRs

  • 4.1.0 release #2851: Updates package versions and changelog entries for ripple-binary-codec and xrpl to newer unreleased versions, similar in nature but for earlier releases.
  • 4.2.0 release #2896: Introduces new features and amendments in ripple-binary-codec and xrpl for earlier versions; related by version progression but no overlapping code changes.

Suggested reviewers

  • pdp2121
  • achowdhry-ripple

Poem

A hop and a skip, a changelog anew,
Two versions appear, with nothing else to do.
No code was disturbed, no features unfurled,
Just dates and some numbers, announced to the world.
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a1ecae and ed877ce.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/ripple-binary-codec/HISTORY.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/ripple-binary-codec/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/xrpl/HISTORY.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/xrpl/package.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/xrpl/HISTORY.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • packages/ripple-binary-codec/HISTORY.md
  • packages/ripple-binary-codec/package.json
  • packages/xrpl/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: integration (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: integration (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: unit (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: browser (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: unit (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-lint (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/ripple-binary-codec/HISTORY.md (1)

5-6: Confirm new release entry for 2.4.0
Added the ## 2.4.0 (2025-6-09) header under Unreleased correctly.

Consider standardizing the date format across changelog entries to a consistent YYYY-MM-DD style for clarity.

packages/xrpl/HISTORY.md (1)

7-7: Confirm new release entry for 4.3.0
The ## 4.3.0 (2025-6-09) header is correctly placed under Unreleased.

Align date formatting with the rest of the changelog (e.g., use YYYY-MM-DD) for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a997c8 and 6f3c808.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/ripple-binary-codec/HISTORY.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/xrpl/HISTORY.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: integration (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: integration (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: unit (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: browser (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: unit (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-lint (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)

@khancode khancode merged commit 3c19700 into main Jun 9, 2025
14 checks passed
@khancode khancode deleted the 4.3.0-release branch June 9, 2025 21:01
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
9 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025
9 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants