Add test case for fixes to getCorrespondingTile when called on certain SLL tiles#1360
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Chris Lavin <chris.lavin@amd.com>
…n SLL tiles Signed-off-by: Andrew Butt <Andrew.Butt@amd.com>
clavin-xlnx
reviewed
Apr 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Andrew Butt <Andrew.Butt@amd.com>
clavin-xlnx
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some Versal devices contain both SLL and SLL_1 tile name roots, even though both name roots have the same tile type (SLL). These different tile name roots have overlapping coordinates, so there can be an SLL tile and an SLL_1 tile with the same X, Y coordinates. This is a test for a change to the rapidwright-api that allows SLL tiles to be relocated to SLL_1 tiles and vice versa, creating more opportunities for module relocation.