Skip to content

Add UI and cpp tests#4

Draft
abenso wants to merge 3 commits intodevfrom
feat/ui
Draft

Add UI and cpp tests#4
abenso wants to merge 3 commits intodevfrom
feat/ui

Conversation

@abenso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@abenso abenso commented May 23, 2025 •
edited by zboto Bot
Loading

Added transaction parser
Added data rendering
Added UI

🔗 zboto Link

github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security AI found potential problems May 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment thread app/src/render.c Fixed
Comment thread app/src/schema_txn_parser.c Fixed
Comment thread app/src/ui_item_buffer.c Fixed
Comment thread app/src/ui_item_manager.c Fixed
@0xPxt 0xPxt mentioned this pull request May 30, 2025
Merged
@chcmedeiros chcmedeiros self-requested a review June 2, 2025 13:50
@abenso abenso force-pushed the feat/merkle_proof branch from 644a297 to fa21fb2 Compare June 9, 2025 13:50
@abenso abenso changed the base branch from feat/merkle_proof to dev June 10, 2025 08:03
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Jun 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment thread app/src/borsh.c
ZEMU_LOGF(100, "%s\n", print);
#else
printf("%s\n", str);
// printf("%s\n", str);

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Commented-out code Note

This comment appears to contain commented-out code.

Copilot Autofix

AI 11 months ago

To fix the problem, we should remove the commented-out line // printf("%s\n", str); entirely. This will clean up the code and eliminate the distraction of commented-out code. If the functionality is needed in the future, it can be reintroduced with proper context and testing.

Suggested changeset 1
app/src/borsh.c

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/app/src/borsh.c b/app/src/borsh.c
--- a/app/src/borsh.c
+++ b/app/src/borsh.c
@@ -121,3 +121,2 @@
 #else
-    // printf("%s\n", str);
 #endif
EOF
@@ -121,3 +121,2 @@
#else
// printf("%s\n", str);
#endif
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@abenso abenso force-pushed the feat/ui branch 2 times, most recently from 1c4579e to 727e48a Compare June 10, 2025 10:54
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Jun 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment thread app/src/ui_item_manager.c
Comment on lines +44 to +45
// print_string("Appended variant name\n");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Commented-out code Note

This comment appears to contain commented-out code.

Copilot Autofix

AI 11 months ago

To fix the issue, the commented-out code should be removed entirely. This will eliminate the distraction and potential confusion caused by its presence. Specifically, the lines containing // print_string(...) should be deleted. This change will not affect the existing functionality, as the code is already commented out and not executed.

Suggested changeset 1
app/src/ui_item_manager.c

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/app/src/ui_item_manager.c b/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
--- a/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
+++ b/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
@@ -43,4 +43,3 @@
 
-    // print_string("Appended variant name\n");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+
 
@@ -58,4 +57,3 @@
 
-    // print_string("Removed last variant");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+
 
@@ -75,4 +73,3 @@
 
-    // print_string("is_item_title_empty");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+
 
EOF
@@ -43,4 +43,3 @@

// print_string("Appended variant name\n");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);


@@ -58,4 +57,3 @@

// print_string("Removed last variant");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);


@@ -75,4 +73,3 @@

// print_string("is_item_title_empty");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);


Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Comment thread app/src/ui_item_manager.c
Comment on lines +59 to +60
// print_string("Removed last variant");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Commented-out code Note

This comment appears to contain commented-out code.

Copilot Autofix

AI 11 months ago

The best way to fix the problem is to either remove the commented-out code entirely or reinstate it if it is still needed. Since there is no indication that the commented-out code is required, the most appropriate action is to remove it. This will improve code readability and maintainability by eliminating unnecessary clutter.

The changes will involve removing the commented-out lines on lines 44-45, 59-60, and 76-77. These lines contain calls to print_string that are currently commented out.

Suggested changeset 1
app/src/ui_item_manager.c

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/app/src/ui_item_manager.c b/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
--- a/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
+++ b/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@
 
-    // print_string("Appended variant name\n");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+    
+    
 
@@ -58,4 +58,4 @@
 
-    // print_string("Removed last variant");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+    
+    
 
@@ -75,4 +75,4 @@
 
-    // print_string("is_item_title_empty");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+    
+    
 
EOF
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@

// print_string("Appended variant name\n");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);



@@ -58,4 +58,4 @@

// print_string("Removed last variant");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);



@@ -75,4 +75,4 @@

// print_string("is_item_title_empty");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);



Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Comment thread app/src/ui_item_manager.c
Comment on lines +76 to +77
// print_string("is_item_title_empty");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Commented-out code Note

This comment appears to contain commented-out code.

Copilot Autofix

AI 11 months ago

To fix the issue, we should either remove the commented-out code entirely or reinstate it if it serves a valid purpose. Since there is no indication that the commented-out code is necessary, the best course of action is to remove it. This will clean up the codebase and eliminate potential confusion for future developers. Specifically, we will remove the lines // print_string("is_item_title_empty"); and // print_string(item_title_buffer.data); from the is_item_title_empty function.

Suggested changeset 1
app/src/ui_item_manager.c

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/app/src/ui_item_manager.c b/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
--- a/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
+++ b/app/src/ui_item_manager.c
@@ -75,4 +75,4 @@
 
-    // print_string("is_item_title_empty");
-    // print_string(item_title_buffer.data);
+
+
 
EOF
@@ -75,4 +75,4 @@

// print_string("is_item_title_empty");
// print_string(item_title_buffer.data);



Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in a Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch feat/ui

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chcmedeiros chcmedeiros Awaiting requested review from chcmedeiros

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@abenso @github-advanced-security