Skip to content

Conversation

@pstephengoogle
Copy link
Contributor

@pstephengoogle pstephengoogle commented Aug 22, 2025

Reverts enforcement of uuid on context_id in task creation

Fixes #427

Release-As: 0.3.3

@pstephengoogle pstephengoogle requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2025 18:30
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @pstephengoogle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily reverts a previous change that enforced a UUID structure on the context_id during task creation, providing greater flexibility for task identifiers. Additionally, it includes significant refactoring in proto_utils.py to improve the handling of Protocol Buffer Struct conversions and introduces support for agent extensions within capability definitions.

Highlights

  • Revert UUID Enforcement: The core change in this PR is the removal of the validation logic that enforced a UUID structure on the context_id when creating new tasks. This allows for more flexible context_id values.
  • Protocol Buffer Conversion Refactoring: The proto_utils.py file has been refactored to streamline the conversion between Python dictionaries and Protocol Buffer struct_pb2.Struct objects. This includes the introduction of a new dict_to_struct helper function and the adoption of json_format.MessageToDict for reverse conversions.
  • Agent Extension Support: New functionality has been added to support agent extensions within the AgentCapabilities proto conversions, allowing for more detailed descriptions and parameters for agent capabilities.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request reverts the enforcement of UUID format for context_id in task creation, which aligns with the stated goal. Additionally, it introduces several improvements for converting between Python dictionaries and Protobuf Struct messages, making the code more robust by supporting various data types instead of just strings. The changes are well-implemented. I have one suggestion to simplify the new dict_to_struct utility function by using a built-in method, which would make it more concise and efficient.

@holtskinner
Copy link
Member

Looks like there's a unit test error:

FAILED tests/utils/test_task.py::TestTask::test_new_task_with_invalid_context_id - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'ValueError'>

@holtskinner holtskinner enabled auto-merge (squash) August 22, 2025 21:09
@holtskinner holtskinner disabled auto-merge August 22, 2025 21:09
@holtskinner holtskinner merged commit e3a7207 into main Aug 22, 2025
8 checks passed
@holtskinner holtskinner deleted the id_cleanup branch August 22, 2025 21:14
Copy link

@kgan78 kgan78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aaakk

holtskinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.3.3](v0.3.2...v0.3.3)
(2025-08-22)


### Features

* Update proto conversion utilities
([#424](#424))
([a3e7e1e](a3e7e1e))


### Bug Fixes

* fixing JSONRPC error mapping
([#414](#414))
([d2e869f](d2e869f))
* Revert code that enforces uuid structure on context id in tasks
([#429](#429))
([e3a7207](e3a7207)),
closes [#427](#427)


### Performance Improvements

* optimize logging performance and modernize string formatting
([#411](#411))
([3ffae8f](3ffae8f))


### Reverts

* Revert "chore(gRPC): Update a2a.proto to include metadata on
GetTaskRequest"
([#428](#428))
([39c6b43](39c6b43))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feat]: relax id validation enforcement

5 participants