Skip to content

docs: remove unsupported lead/worker docs and scripts#8471

Merged
angiejones merged 5 commits intoaaif-goose:mainfrom
markshaggy:cleanup/remove-lead-worker
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

docs: remove unsupported lead/worker docs and scripts#8471
angiejones merged 5 commits intoaaif-goose:mainfrom
markshaggy:cleanup/remove-lead-worker

Conversation

@markshaggy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Removes unsupported lead/worker docs and legacy test script, and updates multi-model documentation to supported workflows (planning mode + subagents). This cleans up outdated references and prevents users from following no-longer-supported setup paths.

Scope

  • Deleted:
    • documentation/docs/tutorials/lead-worker.md
    • documentation/blog/2025-08-11-llm-tag-team-lead-worker-model/index.md
    • scripts/test_lead_worker.sh
  • Updated related docs/guides/blogs to remove GOOSE_LEAD* / GOOSE_WORKER* usage and replace links/content with supported alternatives.

Validation

  • npm test in documentation/ passed.
  • Verified no remaining lead/worker references in docs/scripts (lead/worker, lead-worker, GOOSE_LEAD*, GOOSE_WORKER*).
  • npm run typecheck and npm run build in this environment are blocked by pre-existing/unrelated issues.

Signed-off-by: Mark Shaggy <keramshag@gmail.com>
…g churn

Restore deleted blog posts and mark them as unlisted with a danger
admonition pointing to Planning Mode. Revert unrelated Goose→goose
casing changes to keep the PR focused on lead/worker removal.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Angie Jones <jones.angie@gmail.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1e46421005

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Prevents broken links from unlisted blog posts and any external
references to /docs/tutorials/lead-worker.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Angie Jones <jones.angie@gmail.com>
@angiejones
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

thanks so much @markshaggy! 🙏🏽

Update internal links from /docs/tutorials/lead-worker to
/docs/guides/creating-plans to fix Docusaurus build-time broken
link check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Angie Jones <jones.angie@gmail.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6a6311a7c3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Replace "Lead/Worker model is available now" with a note that it's
been removed and a pointer to Planning Mode.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Angie Jones <jones.angie@gmail.com>
@angiejones angiejones added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 10, 2026
Merged via the queue into aaif-goose:main with commit 0e74311 Apr 10, 2026
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants