Skip to content

Conversation

@adtzlr
Copy link
Owner

@adtzlr adtzlr commented Dec 24, 2025

This is not used at all and the explicit BoundaryDict.items() still works. As the return value of the loadcases have changed, this will throw an error for old scripts which contain boundaries, loadcase = fem.dof.uniaxial(field).

@adtzlr adtzlr self-assigned this Dec 24, 2025
@adtzlr adtzlr added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 24, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.40%. Comparing base (db15698) to head (610cc7e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1023   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.40%   97.40%           
=======================================
  Files         184      184           
  Lines        7015     7018    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         6833     6836    +3     
  Misses        182      182           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@adtzlr adtzlr merged commit 772ab7f into main Dec 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@adtzlr adtzlr deleted the boundarydict-no-iteration branch December 24, 2025 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants