Skip to content

ZeptoClaw: Email Sender Spoofing to bypass Header-Only From Allowlist Validation

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 11, 2026 in qhkm/zeptoclaw • Updated Mar 12, 2026

Package

cargo zeptoclaw (Rust)

Affected versions

<= 0.7.5

Patched versions

0.7.6

Description

Summary

The email channel authorizes senders based on the parsed From header identity only. If upstream email authentication/enforcement is weak (for example, relaxed SPF/DKIM/DMARC handling), an attacker can spoof an allowlisted sender address and have the message treated as trusted input.

Details

Relevant code paths:

  • src/channels/email_channel.rs:311 extracts sender identity from parsed message headers:
    • let from = parsed.from() ... a.address() ...
  • src/channels/email_channel.rs:328 authorizes using that from value:
    • if !self.is_sender_allowed(&from) { ... }
  • src/channels/email_channel.rs:87 onward (is_sender_allowed) performs allowlist/domain matching against the same header-derived value.
  • There is no in-channel validation of sender authenticity indicators such as SPF/DKIM/DMARC results before allowlist trust decisions.

Result:

  • Trust decision is based on a potentially spoofable header field unless mailbox/provider-side anti-spoofing controls are strong and enforced.

PoC

  1. Configure email channel with strict sender allowlist:
    • channels.email.enabled = true
    • channels.email.allowed_senders = ["ceo@example.com"]
    • channels.email.deny_by_default = true
  2. Ensure the monitored mailbox accepts or forwards a spoofed message (for testing, use a local SMTP path that does not enforce sender authentication strongly).
  3. Send an email to the monitored inbox with forged header identity:
python - <<'PY'
import smtplib
from email.message import EmailMessage

msg = EmailMessage()
msg["From"] = "ceo@example.com"   # forged trusted sender
msg["To"] = "bot-inbox@example.net"
msg["Subject"] = "forged control message"
msg.set_content("FORGED EMAIL CONTENT")

# Example test SMTP endpoint
with smtplib.SMTP("127.0.0.1", 25) as s:
    s.send_message(msg)
PY
  1. Wait for IMAP fetch/IDLE processing.
  2. Observe the message is accepted as allowlisted sender ceo@example.com and published as inbound channel input.

Impact

  • Vulnerability type: sender identity spoofing risk due to header-based authorization.
  • Affected deployments: those using email channel allowlists where upstream anti-spoof controls are weak, misconfigured, or bypassed.
  • Security effect:
    • Spoofed From headers may bypass logical sender allowlist.
    • Malicious content can enter trusted automation/agent flows as if sent by authorized identities.
  • Risk is reduced in environments with strict SPF/DKIM/DMARC enforcement and strong inbound mail hygiene, but not eliminated at application layer.

Patch Recommendation

Add a sender-authentication gate in src/channels/email_channel.rs immediately after parsing from (src/channels/email_channel.rs:311) and before allowlist enforcement (src/channels/email_channel.rs:328). The gate should require trusted SPF/DKIM/DMARC evidence with domain alignment (for example, DMARC=pass, or aligned SPF/DKIM pass) before is_sender_allowed is evaluated. For backward compatibility, add a configurable mode in EmailConfig (for example, sender_verification_mode), but recommend hardened settings in production: dmarc_aligned, exact-address allowlists, and deny_by_default=true.

References

@qhkm qhkm published to qhkm/zeptoclaw Mar 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 12, 2026
Reviewed Mar 12, 2026
Last updated Mar 12, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. Learn more on MITRE.

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.